Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JACK R. SMITH JR. who wrote (4978)	2/1/1998 10:05:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Upstream of the Hussayampa River is the Hussayampa Wildlife River Reconstruction Preserve. The map for that I first looked at on an eight foot billboard posted at the local Rest Area. It is all encoumpassing of the upstream Hussayampa River. I think there is no more good spots left. Time and the ravages of stakers all have made their toll. Search some "lead files" and you will see what I saw. It is amazing. The very last day I was in the Public Room ( Now called Information Rooms ) there was a Blonde asking about the files for upstream of one of the creeks west of the Hussayampa River. She had five files and an unhappy look on her face. I was rummaging around and befor I left - she was gone. That was the first week in October. The renewal dates were September.....I think that says alot. Time is all that matters now. That and TECHNOLOGY. One of Sonny LaMonts' claims was NAMED ...TIP #1 and TIP # 2 etc....I wonder what that story is? If I had not shown up an hour or so late and missed connect with someone, I would not of seen this occurrance, but the guy I missed, is responsible for me seeing this weird verification of what I suspected was going to happen to these Desert Dirts ( & Gippy ). Well, did you see the Blonde ( 2 hours earlier)??? Jack, wherewithall? No, just a little map reading and a little perserverance....and knowledge just like most of YOU THREADERS DO HAVE! Landrush...what landrush. Pace is paced, now. Chuca P.S.- Now they make it all easier to read and delete obsolite clauses, this month; go figure: [Federal Register: December 12, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 239)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 65376-65378] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [ wais.access.gpo.gov [DOCID:fr12de97-17] ================================================ ------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management 43 CFR Parts 3740, 3810, and 3820 [WO-340-1220-00-24 1A] RIN 1004-AD05 Multiple Use, Mining; Mining Claims Under the General Mining Laws AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is removing several obsolete or unnecessary regulations, and revising regulations concerning mining on Papago Indian Reservation lands. The regulations BLM is removing concern certain programs under the Multiple Minerals Development Act: claimant's rights; opening of Helium reserves to mining location and mineral leasing; and regulations under the statute entitled ''Mining Rights in Prescott National Forest'' concerning mining in the watershed of the city of Prescott, Arizona. Each of the regulations being removed is unnecessary or obsolete, either because it describes programs which no longer exist or because it contains requirements already achieved by statutes or other applicable regulations. Removing these items will have no impact on BLM customers or the public at large. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 12, 1998. ADDRESSES: You may send inquiries or suggestions to: Director (630), Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20240. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Haskins, Bureau of Land Management, Solid Minerals Group, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone: 202-452-0355. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background and Discussion of Final Rule as Adopted II. Responses to Comments III. Procedural Matters I. Background and Discussion of Final Rule as Adopted The regulations that are being removed are obsolete and unnecessary, and therefore can be eliminated without negative consequences. P.P.S.- I hope no Helium is under the Tip # 1 and Tip # 2 its!!!