Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vic klimpl who wrote (26665)	2/2/1998 6:38:00 AM
From: Noneyet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

To Vic and Cohorts, I'm doing just fine, so save the sympathy for someone else. Why attempt to divert my questions and concerns regarding Ftel. When I seek your advise or money then please question everything, as you should be doing with your holding of Ftel right now. I posted numerous time's yesterday and I'll reference the pertinent posts again for anyone interested. So again, please answer my concerns in a professional manner instead of creating diversions ( with lunatic posts ) from the topic of Ftel. WHAT ARE REVENUES AND PROFITS GOING TO BE ?? exchange2000.com exchange2000.com exchange2000.com exchange2000.com exchange2000.com PS to Vic, Ftel lists Lucent as a competitor on their SEC documents, have you advised Lucent of your involvement with Ftel and if so, didn't Lucent have concerns ? Just curious ?? PS to anyone who would like the SEC to look at my motives for posting, by all means, contact them to see if they will investigate "both sides", bulls and bears ( it should serve a wakeup call to many posting here ). I would welcome their scrutiny, you see I have no position in Ftel, never did !!! I could have purchased at $ 1.50 recently had I wanted to ( in answer to driving the price down for cheap shares ), as I've followed it long before it reached that low. Tom