SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (153146)1/29/2021 3:31:35 PM
From: Jamie153  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219482
 
There's always more. For example, the Fed (member banks) needed reserves so it's logical to think they had less money to lend and less lending means a slower economy but there was a dramatic drop. IMO, if unemployment remained the same it'd make sense, no new lending, no new businesses, no new jobs, but why the big increase in unemployment? The drop in spending programs had to do it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News