SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Chesapeake Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hopeless who wrote (8674)1/31/2021 9:43:46 AM
From: bigg dummy  Respond to of 9054
 
What can we disagree upon? 2004 the stock traded between $6-$3.50. 2011 the stock traded between $18-$10. Last year we diluted with Sprott for the tune of 8M shares and Alderley for 10M shares and the stock is at $3.48. Gold is within $70 of the all time high so we can definitely disagree that CKG will be higher once we see the metals higher. Only people who speak highly of this company are the ones who owned Francisco 20 years ago.



To: hopeless who wrote (8674)1/31/2021 11:44:35 AM
From: Claude Cormier1 Recommendation

Recommended By
ItsAllCyclical

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9054
 
I understand and I wish the same. I have been supporting Randy since 1995 after he and his team at Francisco Gold discovered El Sauzal. That is when I first suggested FGX til the takeover. Then it was CKG for Metates.

This being said there were times when CKG was overpriced and other where it was too cheap, such as today.

The good news about that new process came out at a time that gold is not the fashion of the day. In case you have not notice, many market participants have diversified into cryptos at the expense of the gold markets.. so at the moment many gold stocks are inexpensive with daily volumes in a slow but steady downtrend since last spring.

We have good reason to believe that this will be fixed in 2021, especially for CKG.