SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: oldirtybastard who wrote (739659)2/1/2021 1:20:31 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
Nobody under 6 has died from it.



To: oldirtybastard who wrote (739659)2/1/2021 2:27:53 PM
From: skinowski1 Recommendation

Recommended By
SirWalterRalegh

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
Martin Kulldorff, a Harvard epidemiologist, calculated that the difference in CoViD fatality between the young and the old is 1000 times. Locking up young and working age people was absurd from the very beginning. If they listened to science, it must have been a PC brand of some new social science.



To: oldirtybastard who wrote (739659)2/2/2021 10:09:25 AM
From: Follies  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793964
 
If you're under 40 it's a different disease than if you're over 70. I beliive 50X difference in mortality. Everyone can do the math and make their own risk/reward decisions. Except nobody knows math in this country

I know this is true, but why? Is it that immune systems of young are better or more adaptable? Why is that?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News