Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (193129)	2/4/2021 10:51:42 PM
From: Sam	2 Recommendations Recommended By bentway J_F_Shepard Respond to of 361976

Fraud isn’t the only way to steal elections. I’ve explained how it was done and not one of you has denied it, nor has one of you shown anything related to the election theft to be untrue. Because you know damned well that’s what was done. That is pretty funny. I posted a video of a Republican election official who absolutely denied that anything like fraud existed in Georgia. He went through each of the allegations people have made about Georgia's elections one by one and explained (yet again) how they were wrong. You are the one who didn't deny what he said. I deny that the presidential election was stolen. And so have most people on this thread. You can't even acknowledge that--that is how far from reality you have gone. In one place, you said this So, Democrats in March, April & May started a string of litigation to capitalize on these mail-in ballots. Challenging the need for witnesses, for example, or some signature requirements, on the basis of Covid making it too dangerous. This sort of thing. At the same time, Zuckerberg flooded money into the process, $400 Million. He did it through a 501(c) run by Obama people, previously with a million dollars in revenue, suddenly has $400M to buy votes any way they could. They set up their own "satellite" offices in voting districts so people didn't have to appear in person in the light of day. And because they were "satellite" offices, they didn't need to have partisan Republicans present to see WTF was going on. That's right. If that actually happened, you would have to believe that these terrible criminal Democrats who were rigging the election in favor of Biden didn't bother to vote for the down ballot candidates. After all, aside from the presidency, the Rs had a pretty good election down ballot. That makes zero sense if your allegation was actually true. It would be electoral malpractice in addition to being criminal. And signatures were checked--they were checked against the registration documents that were in computers. They weren't checked when someone filled out the actual ballot, they were checked when the ballot was checked later on. That is the way it works when there is a recount. In another place, you wrote this: If the election were held tomorrow, Trump would still win it just as he did in November, by a landslide. If it was a fair election. Message 33177075 And elsewhere you wrote this: I'll just ask one question: What do you think Zuckerberg spent $400 Million for? A "fair" vote? Do you believe that? Dumping cash into selected precincts in the very cities in which the election was stolen? (Keeping in mind around the country, he put cash into counties, but in Atlanta, Philly, Detroit & Milwaukee, cash was distributed to individual cities and subdistricts of cities). Why? Message 33182006 So which is it: Did Zuckerberg spend $400m in "selected precincts"? If that is so, it is impossible mathematically for Trump to have won "by a landslide"; there simply aren't enough votes in those cities for that to have happened. As it is, Biden won by a electoral landslide by Trump's standards (that is, he won by the same electoral margin as Trump did in 2016). Your case is idiotic. It flies in the face of any sense of reality and isn't even internally consistent. I would say "you know it" but I'm not sure if perhaps you really are afflicted with a kind of delusional insanity which doesn't require either fact or consistency but just insists on your own reality no matter what. That is what you are doing, over and over and over again.

To: i-node who wrote (193129)	2/4/2021 11:58:00 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361976

Right. You know it happened, but you can't prove it happened. Convenient, that.

To: i-node who wrote (193129)	2/5/2021 7:54:17 AM
From: Brumar89	4 Recommendations Recommended By CentralParkRanger combjelly Lane3 rdkflorida2 Respond to of 361976

T *p won the election in a landslide and the election was stolen from him but there wasn't any material election fraud. You're trying to say it was just unfair that so many legitimate votes were cast against your loser candidate. That is patent nonsense. If there wasn't massive vote fraud then T*p LOST! Fraud IS the only way to steal an election.

To: i-node who wrote (193129)	2/5/2021 8:04:26 AM
From: Brumar89	6 Recommendations Recommended By CentralParkRanger J_F_Shepard rdkflorida2 Sam Terry Maloney and 1 more member Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361976

Jewish Space lasers cause forest fires, school shootings are all hoaxes, 911 was a hoax involving explosives planted by our govt, Mossad killed JFK, Reagan assassination attempt was a hoax, Hillary (and Bill Gates, Tom Hanks, and all top Democrats and Hollywood figures) molests and cannibalizes children to get adrenochrome, Obama and Kamala aren't legally qualified to hold office, masks are worthless and even harmful, HQC cures Covid, blue state doctors murdered Covid patients by denying them the HQC cure, Covid is mostly a hoax (the deaths all have other causes and are labeled Covid for financial reasons), the Jan 6 insurrection attack was mostly a peaceful protest marred by the police murder of a young patriot woman who was merely peacefully leading a crowd of peaceful patriot protestors breaking through a broken door window, and Trump won the election in a landslide but the election was stolen without any material election fraud.. Which of these lies don't you believe? MTG inspired me to be comprehensive.