Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Zitel-ZITL What's Happening -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (13935)	2/2/1998 11:27:00 AM
From: Deep Digm	Respond to of 18263

CR, ""To: "Deep-Digm" (13776 ) From: jas singh MD Tuesday, Jan 20 1998 6:10PM EST Reply # of 13936 FWIW, I've been told by Zitel that the 1.3 million lines of code that were given by the Army for code conversion (by Matridigm) went "very smoothly" and is back with that department. Sincerely, Jas"" Bill I've seen no announcement from anyone regarding this. If I remember correctly Jas called Shelley Woods at MD for the above info. Anything I've heard is unconfirmed from sources I couldn't name and would therefore be of no value here. If AMC's code came back with the spec's MD's got posted at their website, they ought to be real happy and MD should get all of the balance, whatever that is. Do you see the 1.3M/loc "number" as a way to "back into" what the AMC's total amount of code is? I mean in trying to decide how much to give MD/NOC for a test, would the AMC have picked a percentage of their total code, possibly 10%, or would they instead pick a "program" whose total LOC happened to total 1.3M? Any thoughts? Have a good one, Deep Digm