Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (168927)	2/25/2021 6:10:04 PM
From: ggersh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218030

This guy? :-O

To: TobagoJack who wrote (168927)	2/25/2021 7:26:00 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 218030

Or, given the links to enzymes we should have, in context of the rest of the article... you could say the problem is a function of dietary choices, or the lack of them... given MAOA is inhibited by MAOI... which is a not uncommon function of many foods... Serotonin also having food links... Everything, to be in and sustain balance, requiring a range in proper precursors... Being angry and violent when society isn't delivering what you need to survive or thrive seems... a biological imperative... rather than a genetic disease. Darwin being right... doesn't define who it is that is more fit ? So, the leap to assumption that "the genes are at fault" rather than "society is at fault" seems obvious error. The suggestion in the article is that kids on common antidepressants would tend to escape the influences noted as "drivers in combination with genetics"... which should be easily proven if true. I doubt it would be proven, given "a pill" as the solution is less likely to work than a pairing of dietary and environmental changes that result in behavioral satiety as a function of unmet needs being met. But, attacking problems as evidenced in effects rather than in causes isn't invented as a problem in this article...

To: TobagoJack who wrote (168927)	2/25/2021 9:11:07 PM
From: marcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218030

"...Early experiences impact children’s future outcomes through biological embedding: the process whereby experiences produce lasting changes in the function of a biological system with consequences for development, behavior, and health ( 1 ?– 3). Early life social experiences (e.g., early caregiving, trauma, maternal mental health) are known to contribute to individual differences in susceptibility and resilience for a range of physical and mental health outcomes ( 4 ? ?– 7). In this primer, we explore epigenetic systems as candidate mechanisms for the biological embedding of experience. For clarity, we adopt an inclusive definition of epigenetics proposed by the NIH Epigenomics Roadmap Project initiative, which states, “Epigenetics refers to both heritable changes in gene activity and expression (in the progeny of cells or of individuals) and also stable, long-term alterations in the transcriptional potential of a cell that are not necessarily heritable”..." pnas.org