SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Robbins who wrote (46940)2/2/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: Mohan Marette  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ken,did they not use the term 'cooked up accounting' or something similiar refering to the accounting practices of Intel? So it is now agressive accounting .If I were Intel I would sue the nincompoophs for slander,if he used 'cooked up accounting',agressive i can live with. Where is John Hull,hey John are you listening????<<GGG>



To: Ken Robbins who wrote (46940)2/2/1998 3:20:00 PM
From: Resry  Respond to of 186894
 
The response I got was similar. Actually his story suggested that the results were not as good as they seemed and that Intel went to great lengths to cover it up.

I wonder how many people believe this stuff.



To: Ken Robbins who wrote (46940)2/2/1998 5:10:00 PM
From: Jules B. Garfunkel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ken,
Go back to Forbes and ask them to explain exactly where they see Intel's accounting practices as "aggressive". I've always, along with most other analysts, considered Intel's accounting practices as "conservative". If Forbes wants to do a story on aggressive acoounting practices, I suggest they look at IBM over the last 18 months.
Jules


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News