Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flashforward2009 who wrote (169004)	2/28/2021 3:58:20 PM
From: Maple MAGA	1 Recommendation Recommended By sense Respond to of 217720

"The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men." AYN RAND “The smallest minority on earth is the individual,” Rand wrote. “Those who deny individual rights, cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.” AYN RAND

To: flashforward2009 who wrote (169004)	2/28/2021 4:04:00 PM
From: Maple MAGA	1 Recommendation Recommended By sense Respond to of 217720

"Simply put is Ayn Rand philosophy nothing more than justification of feudalism?" I don't see any support of feudalism in her writing, feel free to make anything up, everyone else does. "The Renaissance was the great rebirth intellectually, but not politically. Still seeking order and unity, men attempted to solve the problem of feudal tyranny by replacing many small tyrants with a single big one. This was the birth of modern absolute monarchies." AYN RAND "Only three brief periods of history were culturally dominated by a philosophy of reason: ancient Greece, the Renaissance, the nineteenth century. These three periods were the source of mankind’s greatest progress in all fields of intellectual achievement—and the eras of greatest political freedom. The rest of human history was dominated by mysticism of one kind or another, that is: by the belief that man’s mind is impotent, that reason is futile or evil or both, and that man must be guided by some irrational “instinct” or feeling or intuition or revelation, by some form of blind, unreasoning faith. All the centuries dominated by mysticism were the eras of political tyranny and slavery, of rule by brute force—from the primitive barbarism of the jungle—to the Pharaohs of Egypt—to the emperors of Rome—to the feudalism of the Dark and Middle Ages—to the absolute monarchies of Europe—to the modern dictatorships of Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany and all their lesser carbon copies." AYN RAND "The supernatural doctrines of the Middle Ages, . . . kept men huddling on the mud floors of their hovels, in terror that the devil might steal the soup they had worked eighteen hours to earn." AYN RAND "The dominant moralists had said that man must not seek his ultimate fulfillment on earth; that he must renounce the pleasures of this life, whether as a flesh-mortifying ascetic or as an abstemious toiler, for the sake of God, salvation, and the life to come . . . . Whatever their concern with the individual soul, the medievals had derogated or failed to discover the individual man. In philosophy, the Platonists had denied his reality; in practice, the feudal system had (by implication) treated the group—the caste, the guild, etc.—as the operative social unit." AYN RAND "In the history of Western civilization, the period known as the Dark Ages, after the fall of the Roman Empire, was a period when Western Europe existed without any social organization beyond chance local groupings clustered around small villages, large castles, and remnants of various traditions—swept periodically by massive barbarian invasions, warring robber bands, and sundry local looters. It was as close to a state of pure anarchy as men could come. The feudal system grew out of the need for organized protection. The system, in essence, consisted in the peasants swearing allegiance to a lord, who claimed ownership of the land and a percentage of their harvest in exchange for his duty to protect them against military attacks. This system brought some semblance of order, but no protection and no peace. Disarmed men were left in the total power of an armed ruler, who had his own military gang and who robbed them as ruthlessly as, but more systematically than, any foreign invader. The history of the Middle Ages is a series of internal and external wars: there were various lords struggling to enlarge their domains, foreign lords struggling to subjugate neighboring lands, and bloody, hopeless uprisings of desperate peasants, bloodily suppressed. It was also the longest period of stagnation—intellectually and productively—in Europe’s history." AYN RAND

To: flashforward2009 who wrote (169004)	3/1/2021 7:37:55 AM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maurice Winn Respond to of 217720

No.. Randian objectivism is the extreme opposite of feudalism... as its insistence on radical individualism disallows slavery or serfdom... for which see, too late, Hayek's's bit on how to avoid taking the wrong road to get us back there again. Anyone who thinks Rand's school, or any other flavor of libertarian thought, is fostering feudalism... or any other form of government oppression... rather than intending it be demolished... isn't paying attention... Feudalism is what we have again now... as a product of liberal financial elites imposition of themselves as our new feudal overlords... along with the re-imposition of "managed trade" as was true in feudalism... the means of oppression and theft of wealth is a pairing of force preventing proper function of free choice in markets and theft by excessive taxes... That they tax your taxes in dollars now instead of wheat and sheep... doesn't alter the impact ?