Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: petal who wrote (66807)	3/6/2021 8:27:15 PM
From: Spekulatius	1 Recommendation Recommended By petal Respond to of 78918

I'm not too impressed with his real life portfolio though. Also, a problem with his (and much other) research is that much of it is based on back-testing. Yes Tobias Carlisle portfolio is low EBIT/EV stocks. He has backtested this and claims it works better than the Magic Formula (which uses EBIT/EV and ROIC or ROA). I listed to his podcast which is pretty good, especially the value after hours with Bill Brewster and Jake Taylor. FWIW, many things that coworker well with backtesting did not work in the future. I also wonder about the logic why a simple screen by one metric (EBIT/EV) would work at all. Well, I guess it is contrarian, but contrarian by itself is not necessarily working either. (Just ask Grantham‘s investors). So I agree that I am not sure that his portfolio, which is implement in the $ZIG ETF will work (so far it hasn’t).