Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Heywood40 who wrote (33238)	3/5/2021 4:31:37 AM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 50010

"the likelihood of being infected by droplet-borne virus vs. aerosol-borne virus" Please inform me of the latest propaganda info you have been provided with to disperse to the general public. As said, I am all ears.

To: Heywood40 who wrote (33238)	3/5/2021 5:04:40 AM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 50010

droplet-borne virus vs. aerosol-borne virus, Is surface tension going to come into the discussion? That is one of my favs. How big is a "droplet" for example. ? How long is a piece of string.? I presume when we are talking about "droplets" we are talking about something bigger then a virus. Although some animals grow a new head, or a new butthole (depending which half), if you chop them in two, but I am not jumping to any conclusions here. I am assuming any "droplet" must contain an integer, or whole number of viruses. No portion of a virus is allowed into my calculations. ... so any "droplet" has to be bigger than a SARS2 Covid virus yes? What about the size of an influenza virus.... is that much smaller? Looks as if you have "caught me out", I bow to your superior knowledge on the subject. I do wonder why the Chinese have started to check peoples buttholes for viruses. Are the droplets of a more consistent size there? Let us humble average citizens know the score.