Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (39917)	2/2/1998 5:07:00 PM
From: tonto	Respond to of 55532

Pugs, you really are funny. Thanks.

To: Pugs who wrote (39917)	2/2/1998 5:19:00 PM
From: Joe Master	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

What is the number of Mr. Dendro's post everyone is referring to? I would like to review it without going through 1000 missed posts. TIA Joe

To: Pugs who wrote (39917)	2/2/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: Eric Maggard	Respond to of 55532

Just checking in. LOL I guess the reason you don't want to discuss fundamentals and only the short is because one is verifiable and the other isn't. I am sorry that I don't have time to follow this thread, but good luck to the longs. I have the ticker on my stock ticker and will notice when it starts trading. Good luck on the squeeze, Eric

To: Pugs who wrote (39917)	2/2/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Mr. Dendro	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Oh no! I've officially been labeled a "nay" and a "share-shaker." Pugs, all I know is what I was told when I called RMIL: last week Lori said she was "compiling" the numbers in the float, and she would have the numbers the next day. Today, she said she never got to it since she doing "a copying job for the SEC." She never suggested I would have to talk to Morgan to get the float numbers. Also, if Lori was still compliling the figures, why would Morgan have an accurate number? Then, I asked about the $5 million. She said "Still no word." I asked "so you haven't heard anything?" She said no. To me, that means RMIL has not heard yet from RMCW. If they have, and Lori was misleading me, that is a very serious matter. A company cannot lie to its shareholders, and I do not believe RMIL was doing so. Instead, I prefer to believe they were speaking truthfully, and have not yet received any word regarding the $ 5 million. Finally, as regards the "copying job for the SEC," you attack that statement, but do not offer an explanation as to why RMIL is copying documents for the SEC. To me, that raises alarms. I hope I'm wrong, but but my first reaction was that it indicates some type of continuing investigation of the questions surrounding this company. That is purely my opinion, however. Perhaps it has to do with the SEC investigation of Mork, and has nothing to do with RMIL, but given the previous halt, and the fact that the SEC often continues to investigate companies even after such a halt is lifted, I am concerned. As a shareholder, I am entitled to express that concern, and I simply did so. Take it for what its worth.