Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Techniclone (TCLN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alys Hall who wrote (1236)	2/2/1998 5:54:00 PM
From: Jeffrey L. Henken	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3702

Agendas? Ever wonder how easy it is to determine the real investors from the people with personal agendas? In some cases at SI it's not really all that hard. You see all you have to do is click on the posters name and read back through the history of their posts. Look for a few hints to determine credibility. Like does this person leave their e-mail address? If not, why is that? I like to see real names like mine. You know the one and only Jeffrey L Henken. Not only am I an actual person but I use my own name. How about the number of threads a person posts on. Isn't one of the fundamental rules of investing to diversify? I see an awful lot of posters here who only post on this thread. People even if you are who you say you are, and are not attempting to manipulate this stock, please use some common sense and diversify. You see, even honest individuals like myself can unknowingly develope an agenda when we have too much of any one stock. I try very hard to be one of those rare individuals who posts to educate rather than manipulate but it happens even to me. So what am I saying? Don't trust the majority of what you read here on this thread because it is being manipulated and you are being lied to and not by me. Someone here, and he knows who he is, thinks that just because I know Brenda Greer I have an agenda based on her own. Not so, you see I enjoy uncovering a good liar in the act. In the last couple of years I've exposed few just by reading their past posts. Please people remember that everything you read is not factual. company officials often post on threads under assumed indentities. Individual investors can and do get carried away with their own agendas. PUMP and DUMP? Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe not anymore. Do your due diligence all you investors who read this thread and check out your fellow posters! Regards, Jeff

To: Alys Hall who wrote (1236)	2/2/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: shero	Respond to of 3702

Alys, don't pay any mind to JB. Criticism from someone whose most meaningful contribution to this thread has been the statement "management doesn't matter" is a compliment. Who will ever forget his inane comparison of MSFT to TCLN and Bill Gates to Lon Stone. We still laugh about that but who cares what an unemployed sunbaked....thinks. I'm glad I give these guys something to think about, its less time they have to figure out conspiracy theries. And Baker still doesn't get it. While Davis thinks someone is trying to take over TCLN, and Baker is complimenting him on his deductive prowess it appears to me that investors with a built in profit are trying to get out of the stock. Period, the end. It may be more complicated than that, but no one has produced one shred of evidence. Jim, a couple of things. I stated that if a new CEO was not appointed that the stock was going south. One wasn't and the stock did. Unfortunately I had no say in the matter or I would have nominated you or Davis. And there will never be a short squeeze. Its a figment of Davis' imagination. I'll tell you why. A short squeeze is when...you know what it is. Since the S-3 investors can convert into common anytime they want they never have to go into the market to "cover". And any amount of buying up to $10,000,000 (that's the 12MM minus the 2MM Davis says was converted) won't make a difference. What kind of announcement can you think of that TCLN MGMT can make that will produce that kind of volume? Only Davis has an imagination that big. And I pray he is right. I don't mean to pick on Davis but the truth, from the companies detractors or touts has to be acknowledged. There is no conspiracy or short squeeze. Everyone here wants to see any evidence to the contrary. And Jim, one last thing. Its still about lousy management. You must be the only person in the world who thinks when a stock goes in one year from $7+ to $1- that it doesn't matter.