SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Teri Skogerboe who wrote (15339)2/2/1998 5:04:00 PM
From: stockycd  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 70976
 
Will the NSM announcement today erase all of todays
gains, tomorrow?



To: Teri Skogerboe who wrote (15339)2/2/1998 11:10:00 PM
From: Big Bucks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
Teri,
Re: "The new process will yield four times as many chips per wafer as Intel's current process, and will increase production capacity and improve margins."

I understood the article to state that Intel would revamp its Fab 9
with new equipment to allow 0.25uM Flash chip production. This
shrink in geometry dimensions will increase the amount of transistors
per chip while at the same time increasing the amount of chips on
a 200mm wafer by 4x. This strategic move to increase the
performance and the yield will allow Intel to produce better performing
chips 4x cheaper than its competition which means cheaper prices
to its customers and larger market share and volume purchase contracts which should increase margins. If the competition in
Flash can't keep up technically they will be out produced and under-
cut pricewise. The competitions options seem to be:
1. Buy new equipment to move to 0.25uM.
2. Change product lines away from Flash by developing new products
3. Sell the fab

I hope this answers your question, it still isn't clear to me the point
that either of you was trying to make.

Baffled,
BB