Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (39935)	2/2/1998 6:16:00 PM
From: Mr. Dendro	Respond to of 55532

Off Topic: Hey Pugs, do any of your fights ever make it onto ESPN? If so, let us know. P.S. Next time you box, I wouldn't wear any "shorts." Who knows what you'd be accused of by some on this thread.

To: Pugs who wrote (39935)	2/2/1998 6:25:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 55532

pugs, are you saying that all the shares are locked up by you and the cartel so that rmil will have to open higher when it opens? therefore, if it opens much lower then we know that your paradigm isn't worth a pair a dimes, right? take a stand. quite being wishy washy.

To: Pugs who wrote (39935)	2/2/1998 6:26:00 PM
From: KMT	Respond to of 55532

Pugs: Please read the following post... Message 3323935 You say this thread is to discuss the squeeze. Well I've yet to see a response to my arguments in the second half of the post. Let's see some evidence that the company has 1.2MM shares locked up, any evidence at all. Secondly, it's ludicrous to assume that missing shareholders hold an average of 12,000+ shares. If they're missing from RG's list it means they're not really paying attention, which IMO, says they don't have much of a position, if any. The reason they don't have much of a position is because your wonderful company screwed them with an unannounced 30:1 rollback. You want me and others to believe that these people had 360,000 shares each before the rollback. Come on, get real. It's far more likely that the cumulative total for all missing shareholders is around 100K, not 3MM. If management's been misleading you again with respect to what's locked up, there's no squeeze. If management has been truthful and they've got 1.2MM locked up and RG's numbers are right with respect to what's registered (which I believe they are because RG's been verifying cert numbers) then you've got yourselves a little squeeze coming. I certainly believe the short position was much larger at one time, but they had 3 months to cover, plus if you look at the charts, a squeeze did occur. (.19 to 4.00 and gradually back down). Let's hear a reasonable response from a yay please. Don't just ignore it. Why should we believe that each of the 276 missing shareholders have 12000 shares each? KMT

To: Pugs who wrote (39935)	2/2/1998 6:46:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs: He may feel you have done so much for him already that he doesn't want to be further obligated to you guys. >>>.regardless, I hope that since me & Riley got you into this, you report your cert numbers and dates to Riley....<<< TG

To: Pugs who wrote (39935)	2/2/1998 7:07:00 PM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs this is a great little equation (IS) Issued stock +(SI) Short Interest _______ STOCK AVAILABLE (KS)Known Shareholders +(SP)Street Proxies _______ SUM If....(KS)+(SP)>(IS)+(SI)= UNDECLARED NAKED SHORT POSITION Although absolutely worthless,considering you don't know what the variable are. You keep throwing it around like you have done the calculations,please do so and post your equation, variables, and chicken scratch..I am completely amused,Riley tried this tactic before.. DD