Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KMT who wrote (39936)	2/2/1998 7:53:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Thanks KMT for your comments. There is much I do not comment on regarding other's posts and information I have from my own research. In the end there will be a written history of this epoch net story, the players and their posts. The mistakes in one's dd will become evident and the slack will disappear. This hand has been dealt and soon it will be time for everyone to show their hands. That will be interesting.

To: KMT who wrote (39936)	2/2/1998 9:29:00 PM
From: Angel D	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

KMT, I'm sorry, you'll have to refresh me. I don't remember the "cartel party line" referring to #4 "the fundementals are great". AND, it isn't that hard to find someone outside the cartel who espouses the "party line". Here I am. All you had to do was ask. I have no problem stepping forward. There are others who will join me. However, they may ask "WHAT'S YOUR POINT?". Regards, AD

To: KMT who wrote (39936)	2/2/1998 10:23:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

<<<The most erroneous assumption to me appears to be the 256 missing shareholders and applying to them the average of 12,451 shares each. I don't doubt the number of shareholders, but the average is very skewed IMO.>>> Now folks should understand why most of nays feel it is so important that RMIL management should (have) called for an accounting of all shareholders from the TA. Even sending a corporate newsletter would have been justification for achieving a full accounting of all shareholders so they would be better able to know exactly who holds what. You can't just arbitrarily say that you have 250+ unknown shareholders out there holding an average 12,000 share each... That is lunacy and completely undermines any qualified account of the actual O/S and current float. Oh well... Regards, Ron