Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : NORE - High Tech Bingo Equipment - Online Bingo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David W. Tucker who wrote (782)	2/2/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: george eberting	Respond to of 7701

<<<< 3) If someone has a significant interest in the company, why don't they just accumulate every single share they can get through the market? Because it wouldn't be liquid enough for them later. It wouldn't make sense.>> Actually, it would make a lot of sense if the acquiring company wanted to take NORAM private. Not every great company in the world needs or wants to be publically held. The possibility of Sharp buying all or some of NORAM occurred to me, too. It might work, but it would be a lot different for them than just manufacturing machines. For that reason they would probably not do it IMO. George E.

To: David W. Tucker who wrote (782)	2/2/1998 6:35:00 PM
From: MrBuzz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7701

Here's something to think about and discuss... Since there is no word on the VLTs... Lets assume that the VLTs are NOT online at the moment. Do you think Sharp, LYMCA, and the Venezuelan government like that? I would think they wouldn't as they would have to wait on NORAM. So could it be perhaps that the acquirer that is seeking NORAM is possibly seeking Sharp and/or LYMCA too? Another possibility: Could the acquirers be Sharp and/or LYMCA themselves? MrBuzz LONG ON NRAG. YOU SHOULD BE TOO.