SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Techniclone (TCLN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey L. Henken who wrote (1240)2/3/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: Jim Baker  Respond to of 3702
 
Too many inflammatory or erroneous remarks to respond to one by one in separate messages, so here goes:

People do not post email addresses on SI for the same reason they do not list their phone numbers in the phone book. It cuts down on the amount of junk mail and calls.

I suspect many of us simply see no need to post messages on blue-chip stocks. It is not too intellectually challenging to figure out what will become of IBM and T in 1998. Not much need for dialogue, discussion and debate there. There is here, however.

Slander and libel are actions that are far removed from "I only posted a link." Everyone knows the difference. Shame!

Shero is 100% wrong. I am clearly on record as being an agnostic when it comes to this management. If they are doing anything at the company, it must still be "in progress". Until the stock hits $0 or $10, I will not know how good a job they have done. It has consistently been my stated opinion that management is only one of perhaps five key parts of the current dynamic.

Shere is 100% right. "investors with a built in profit are trying to get out of the stock. Period, the end."

If what Davis says is true, if Darth stated before the fact (when the stock was north of $3) that he would drive this stock to 50 cents, well... it would explain a lot, and it would raise all sorts of new questions for someone to explore.

Somebody just said "the company is being investigated". I guess I missed that press release. Here we go with the baseless Celeryroot "fraud" allegations all over again? What is this guy talking about? I would sincerely like to know the "who" and the "what" of this alleged investigation. A few facts please!

If Davis knows who is selling every day (and why), why can't he determine who is buying every day (and why)? If the data gives you one, it should give you the other.

I never read an Internet post about "agendas" that had any merit or value. They were always childish games of gossip, guessing, and obfuscation that had nothing to do with the prospects of a company or its stock. Please stop wasting my time.