Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ggersh who wrote (169791)	3/22/2021 11:12:22 PM
From: sense	1 Recommendation Recommended By dvdw© Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217768

Didn't we do this already once before ? Far and away the least stupid explanation backed with the most scientific evidence, including over-lapping instances of "can't possibly be anything else" in more than a few cases: Davidovitz from 2006, re Egypt Updated criticism from 2015, re Egypt Huge progress since then... not just in relation to the "archaeology of", but... just that, here, re Peru: [url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330147422_Ancient_organo-mineral_geopolymer_in_South-American_Monuments_Organic_matter_in_andesite_stone_SEM_and_petrographic_evidence]Organic content[/url] is not possible in a natural volcanic andesite tuff welded en masse at or > 1700-1800C Geopolymer in South-American monuments: two scientific papers published Davidovitz lecture on Youtube: Tiwanaku / Pumapunku Megaliths are Artificial Geopolymers