Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (197619)	4/1/2021 10:37:19 AM
From: CentralParkRanger	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mannie Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362111

The foundation of this Republic is - you must respect laws and rules. The main rule of elections is - if you suspect that election was unfair, but you exhausted all legal means to prove it, you must stop whining and accept the defeat to keep the country stable. That's why Trump calls for civil unrest are so damaging for the Republic.

To: Lane3 who wrote (197619)	4/1/2021 12:37:19 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362111

>> There really isn't any practical way to do so beyond recounting votes given the time constraints. Recounting votes is an irrelevant and wasteful activity. I have no idea why anyone would do that. I've counted nuts and bolts, custom stamped steel parts, parts in the paint shop, parts have assembled. Never recounted any. What you SHOULD do, however, is statistically test your results. AFAIK, no one in the voting business does that. It doesn't matter, Lane. You and I disagree. It is a stolen election in my view, and Democrats have fought every opportunity for the truth to come out. The courts in the liberal jurisdictions have supported it, and as Justice Thomas said of the USSC in his dissent: "We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling." I don't really see how one can argue the point Thomas made; it seems sort of indisputable to me. It is a failure of the legal system that is still not fixed. Meanwhile, the titular leader of your party within Congress actually wants to remove a duly elected Republican, the vote for whom was certified, and install the Democrat who lost. I assume you support that as well?