To: Lane3 who wrote (197657 ) 4/1/2021 5:04:39 PM From: i-node Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362151 >> the point that Justice Thomas made, the changes made before the election in response to the pandemic . . . You haven't engaged on that. Sure, I have. That's the cover story for the entire Plouffe/Zuckerberg operation about which I've been one of the few loud voices about. It is core, the driving force, behind the entire election theft, yet you never even discuss it. You act as though it never happened. The key phrase in the plan, refers to the previous election --“[T]he brutal truth is that the election was decided by less than 70,000 votes in three states. … [T]he margin of difference in an entire state might be the vote count in one large neighborhood. … November 3, 2020, may well be the most important Election Day in American history and one of our most important days, period.” They recognized they only needed 70,000+1 votes if they do a few things: - Take advantage of Covid to rewrite the laws in those states, no matter how un-secure that leaves the system. They did it, wrecking the integrity of the federal voting law. - In those areas, get Democrat-only turnout through ballot harvesting. - Block out partisan observers. - Spend whatever is necessary to open "satellite" voting offices that aren't monitored by Republicans where they can "help" voters make the "right" decision. After all, they only need 70,000+1. And it is precisely what they did. And they really did that in the targeted states. With a small investment in a few others, as well as a significant investment in Houston, having gotten a whiff of an opportunity that was shut down by the courts here. It well-conceived, but cheating, any way you look at it. No different from a great bank robbery. You should be able to take pride in your theft. You know, you did America a favor.