Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (170117)	4/2/2021 10:39:49 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 219654

Re <<I could go on but I think those two points are sufficient>> not actually because history is long and never-ending enough, and one can always pick start-end points more convenient to any debate, which I do not recommend, as given china's history, there are many and likely too many start-end points to pick from for which ever discussion one might choose to reckon. as to any perceived disadvantage, eventually turn into pluses, and any perceived advantage has offsetting issues for example, re population count, can be noted that given china's population count, tasks that much more challenging, even as once pointed in the right direction and inertia overcome, an advantage as far as per capita anything, much of anything big needs doing likely not about per capita anything but more to do w/ absolute numbers, etc etc time shall tell, but so far okay as far as mao is concerned, a phase of history gone