Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (197910)	4/4/2021 2:03:08 PM
From: Lane3	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 CentralParkRanger Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 356028

She is the person that controls everything related to these investigations. My question was what in the world makes you think that? It's the same question I asked before? And no one else would have that authority. As I suggested in my previous pose you did not bother to rebut, the justice or counter-terrorism folks. Do you have a better explanation for an autopsy report on Sicknick, which would have been completed no later than Jan 31, not having been released to the public? Or the name of the cop who murdered Ashli Baggett not having been released? Yes, I think. The above folks like to keep their cards close to the vest and not show their hands. It is more important to them (and to us, surely) that they be able to make criminal cases or deter terrorists going forward than to satisfy your curiosity. As for Occam and his Razor, surely the simplest explanation for who is managing the disposition of certain information is the party in charge of that particular stovepipe, not the leader of some other stovepipe. Occam would cringe at the notion that you would tag your most hated person rather than the party with authority over the the salient bailiwick.