SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (197924)4/4/2021 9:09:09 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 356136
 
There is always the possibility of political differences.

You're explaining that wild notion as a matter or political differences? Really? No, it's a matter of logic. There is no logical basis for the publication of the autopsy report to affect my view of the insurrection. Why would it matter? That Sicknick died, while horrible and sad, does not matter wrt the characterization of that event. Why he died matters even less. Had he called in sick that day and not been there, it would have been no more or no less an insurrection. It was an insurrection because it was part of the coup attempt, most of which happened elsewhere. It would be an insurrection if no one died or if fifty people die.


But if she were not trying to sway public opinion, she would release the autopsy report since it generally is the final bit of knowledge about a person's death.


It might sway public opinion about just how malicious the mob was. But only by a few degrees one way or the other. One item in one news cycle. The only reason it's interesting to other than conspiracy theory types is because his death is a bit mysterious.

She would probably not use this tactic unless Trump appeared to be making a strong comeback, so it could be a couple years before we hear anything.

OMG. You seem to have the future of the free world dependent on one cop's autopsy report. I think you're making way, way too much out of this.