Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alex who wrote (7171)	2/3/1998 2:13:00 AM
From: Alex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116764

Clinton Approves Use of Nukes PDD on Iraq Armed with new power to use tactical atomic warheads against Iraqi weapons sites, the United States warned Saddam Hussein yesterday that "substantial" military action is only weeks away. "It's not days and it's not months, so that leaves weeks," Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said in Jerusalem. Washington prefers to find a diplomatic solution to the standoff over U.N. weapons inspections, but "that string is running out," she said. "If diplomacy runs out, we have reserved the right to use force, and if we do so, it will be substantial." Albright did not spell out the threat, but U.S. officials noted that the Clinton administration has changed American nuclear-weapons policy to permit targeting Iraq with tactical atomic warheads. In November, they said, President Clinton signed a top-secret directive allowing the United States to drop atomic bombs on Iraqi weapons sites if Saddam launches a major biological attack on Israel or neighboring countries. Addressing bigwigs in Davos, Switzerland, House Speaker Newt Gingrich endorsed going beyond airstrikes if Saddam doesn't back down. "We cannot afford just a bombing campaign at the end of which he makes weapons of mass destruction, and we cannot afford to walk off and not try to stop him," the Georgia Republican told the World Economic Forum's annual meeting. "Bring all of your diplomatic pressure to bear in the next two weeks. And if he is not prepared to back down, support the United States in whatever level of action we have to take," he said. "And, if he doesn't back down then, support us in whatever level of escalation we have to take." Speaking in Jerusalem, Albright said the administration doesn't think it needs the U.N. Security Counsel to pass a new resolution before the United States can use military force under the existing authorization. "We believe we have the authority for a strike," she said. "The threat posed by Saddam Hussein's continued defiance of the Security Council and obstruction of U.N. weapons inspections is greatest to the peoples of this region." Albright is in the Middle East to rally support for a possible military strike against Iraq. The crisis began in November, when Iraq refused to allow U.N. arms inspectors into presidential compounds and other key sites to search for banned biological, nuclear and chemical weapons. Russia remains opposed to the use of force. Moscow yesterday sent special envoy Viktor Posuvalyuk to Baghdad for the second time in a week to search for a diplomatic compromise. France said it would send a senior official to Iraq within 48 hours, carrying a strong warning from President Jacques Chirac. And Turkish Foreign Minister Ismail Cem announced that his country was ready to mediate. But Saudi Arabia, America's closest ally in the Persian Gulf, said it would not allow the United States to use Saudi bases to mount strikes against Iraq. "Saudi Arabia will not allow any strikes against Iraq, under any circumstances, from its soil or bases in Saudi Arabia, due to the sensitivity of the issue in the Arab and Muslim world," a senior Saudi official said. Washington relied heavily on Saudi and Turkish bases during the 1991 Gulf War. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, meanwhile, asked Albright for several days' advance warning of any strike. New York Post, Feb. 2, 1998

To: Alex who wrote (7171)	2/3/1998 2:52:00 AM
From: D LEE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116764

For all the worries about Indonesia or South Korea, Japan's economy is twice as large as that of the rest of Asia put together, and so many analysts say the key question that will determine the future of the Asian crisis is simply this: What will happen in Tokyo?(AS per the above post:) I recall reading, perhaps 2 years ago: "in order for Japan to keep it's act together, it is necessary for her to move aggresively into, reshape and "educate" the markets to her east. But this was politically a very touchy situation. So, since then, I have been thinking the reverse! "What will happen to Asia?" If both articles have substance, it looks years too late for the blind to start leading the blind. There's no stage to do the acting in. Or am I all wet? Dave