Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (198531)	4/11/2021 3:11:49 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356263

>> Had the shooter been uniformed National Guard, would your view that it was not a righteous shoot differ? No, as mentioned, as teenager I was furious at the Kent State incident. This is the same. She was protesting, and she was murdered for it. Did she go too far? Yes. She did NOT commit any violent act, and she absolutely did not put anyone's life or property in danger. It was not an acceptable use of deadly force. A proper action would have been to demand she surrender and she would still be alive and he would not be looking at the possibility of charges. There is a worthwhile article here, a sort of narrative of Sharyl Attkisson's struggle to get information. Crickets: Sharyl Attkisson demands to know who killed Ashli Babbitt and why it's being kept a secret (bizpacreview.com) Hopefully, she [perhaps the most important voice in the demand for openness, as she does have proven temerity] will be able to obtain some facts over time. Few in the media care. It is just like the Hunter Biden corruption case. Nothing to see here, move along.