SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Anything graphite based, CCB, Zen and hopefully much more. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: the Chief who wrote (2379)4/14/2021 6:33:23 PM
From: stuffbug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2618
 
The mice studies date back to 2016.

Question - Why didn't ZEN anticipate this issue?
Did anyone there ever perform a search on graphene / graphene oxide toxicity?

If ZEN was as concerned about safety as much as they say they are, they should have researched the issue, then performed testing to determine whether any graphene could be inhaled from masks manufactured with their ink. That's known as being proactive.

When I scanned the disinformation board last weekend, I was absolutely appalled by the complete lack of sensitivity by most of the posters. All they cared about was the ZEN share price. Even some of "blame the victim" (the individual who reported his concerns to Health Canada) going on and downplaying the seriousness of the issue. They claimed the ZEN masks were completely safe even though we have yet to see a published trial that examines the potential of inhaling graphene nanoparticles from masks coated with ZENGuard.



To: the Chief who wrote (2379)4/15/2021 8:23:31 AM
From: tturner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2618
 
Exposure to GO concentrations >50 µg/ml resulted in A549 cytotoxicity, while concentrations >20 µg/ml were found to be cytotoxic to human fibroblasts and lung epithelial cells ( 30). The results of the present study revealed that the injection of lower doses of GO (5 and 10 mg/kg) via the tail vein did not induce significant lung edema, vascular permeability or histopathological changes. In addition, low doses exerted no significant effect on oxidative injury and inflammatory reactions in the lung. However, higher concentrations of GO (50 and 100 mg/kg) induced lung edema and increased lung vascular permeability and histopathological changes, as well as triggered oxidative injury and inflammation These results indicate that the toxic effects of GO are dose-dependent. This phenomenon has also been reported in previous studies. In an in vivo experiment on mice, low- (0.1 mg) and medium- (0.25 mg) level exposure to GO was not associated with significant toxicity, but high-level exposure (0.4 mg) was chronically toxic ( 31). Furthermore, inflammatory cell infiltration, granulomatosis and pulmonary edema were observed in the lungs of mice injected with 10 mg/kg GO, whereas those injected with 1 mg/kg excreted the GO after 1 week, and no significant pathological response was observed ( 32).


Zen stuff is used topicaly.. not injected and this study used milli grams, Zen uses micro grams.... believe there are 2 micro grams per mask. I doubt if all 2 micro grams get to the lungs.


Granted, HC would want a bench mark on how much could cause problems, but zen should be out of the woods when all is said and done.