Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (170525)	4/15/2021 3:22:18 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	1 Recommendation Recommended By sense Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217656

I exchange many opinions with Paul Martin - found also many mistakes that he makes in his calculations, and he adjusted accordingly. We are in agreements on most issues. Supposedly he knows chemistry that is all! He is no expert in other fields.- NADA Hydrogen today is not design to power small cars, when the average car is driven no more than 50 miles daily stands idle all night and can be recharged or at least 8 hours at the workplace parking lot where the batteries can be also recharged. Hydrogen has its uses and proper way of extraction with much more electrical efficiency of up to 93% Fuel Cells have low efficiency of 60% similar to combined cycle powerstations compared to 30% to top 40% for IC engines. Hydrogen has 140MJ/kg in oxidation energy compared to 45 MJ/kg for gasoline and 55 MJ/kg for NG Hydrogen is difficult to transport and in general to handle if not used close to the place of generation. Martin's opinion are not the 10 commandments