Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (170698)	3/1/2022 12:11:07 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217906

I am guessing soon we shall see full expression of extremis except Team China bum-rushed the BTC miners off of its domain, for the most part, and enabled Team USA to stitch BTC into own monetary DNA am guessing that once god-point solar energy (where the cost of solar electricity is < cost of thermal electricity), China should be able to wrestle back hash rate production by retiring some surplus supercomputers to easy BTC mining work Message 33286926

To: TobagoJack who wrote (170698)	5/17/2022 7:34:11 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 217906

RE <<if the Chinese are doing it, they are setting up for a bum-rush, I wager, and if so, both BTC and Au are buy-buy-buys My wager is that the eCNY shall have on-/off-ramps to both gold and bitgold, and in extremis, Russia and China can announce experimental settlement of trade balance by the bitcoins produced in each nation, as both are large producers Should a trade deficit persist, bitcoin mines can be relocated in containers across the physical border, or easier, just switch the power feed from the deficit nation Bitcoin represents little danger to either domain, and is deadly to many other like-minded domains and coalition of wastrels >> turns out Au buy ok, BTC buy not so much, but the imperative for both now clearer