Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sense who wrote (170994)	4/25/2021 4:44:23 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218246

was really a statement dressed up as a question and not a dig at James in the least.. he knows the answer also for sure... and wrt obvious.. it is the short answer that is obvious... but the reasons for the short answer all part of the answer are quite a bit more expansive... and not inconsequential :) There is a coercion or shaming if you will factor at play.. What we need in government is to have people of quality, able to get the job done for us.. elected on merit.... regardless of who the are... who is truly inconsequential and so are all the parameters that encompass the who... OK so if the who has a pedophile component... that would be a deal breaker ... the exclusion factors should be extremely few... they were not in the past...:)