Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DIGL... Digital Lightwave.... Making Waves.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter R Smith who wrote (356)	2/3/1998 12:50:00 PM
From: ahhaha	Respond to of 934

At this point TA is irrelevant. The stock is busted. The issue is the fundamental prospects. I also don't agree about the trust and lawsuit impact, it's valid but if the company started selling boxes rapidly,it would all evaporate. The suits would be withdrawn. They won't go any where anyway because for the last 50 years there has been 10,000 similar incidents. I don't believe one of them was tried to a significant benefit to shareholders. The reason is the protection afforded by the limited liability provision of the corporate structure. And am I glad that's the case. So let's get off this price discussion and start looking into fundamental prospects. I believe the ATT SONET expansion deal that ATT is discussing with TCI and TWX will give the company a boost in sales. This is not in analyst's evaluation potential. You guys want to criticize this claim?

To: Peter R Smith who wrote (356)	2/3/1998 1:50:00 PM
From: squirrel	Respond to of 934

You spoke so concisely in your post #353, it was difficult for me to weigh the validity of your comments. I was not disputing the merits of your style of analysis; I was looking for clarification of your analysis. Thanks for coming back with some detail to your reasoning. Now here's wishin' and hopin' that I'm not the only one out here that needed clarification to your post #353. I look forward to future posts from you.

To: Peter R Smith who wrote (356)	2/23/1998 9:27:00 AM
From: Moving Forward	Respond to of 934

Hi Everyone. I am new to this board. Peter apparently the analysts are in agreement with you. Per what I see as of 2/19/98 - 2 analysts have now placed Digl at a Strong Buy and 3 are at Hold. In the face of all the bad news with this stock. This is definitely encouraging news. I agree that the stock was oversold. IMHO it looks like good now for the long.

To: Peter R Smith who wrote (356)	4/21/1998 4:49:00 PM
From: squirrel	Respond to of 934

Peter, Back on February 3, you said, >I solely use TA, breakouts etc. >Do not know a thing about DIGL, before it crashed, still do not >know that much, but do know that statistically it is oversold and >that if you examine enough big falls like this with a 6month + >window then you can get some good odds. >I don't know that it will happen, I can't make it happen, >I do know it is more likely to happen and what that % is ...... My personal opinion about the company has not changed, but it appears that your 'system' regarding oversold and recovery has been, at a minimum, partially correct. DIGL was priced under $4 at the time you posted, and has since sold for somewhere around $7. Since you took the time to respond to my earlier questions, congratulations on your subsequent success seemed to be in order. Congratulations!