Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Buckeye who wrote (2553)	2/3/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: Freddie Forte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Buckeye....Great Stuff. Pieces are falling into place. The higher the share price , the more cash he can borrow. It's a double edged sword, however. The more money he borrows, the more shares will be issued. Whenever he borrows, expect some dilution. If acquisitions is Ira's intent, the trade-off may be worth it.

To: Buckeye who wrote (2553)	2/3/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: Jonathan Lebed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Buckeye, Are you Ira Monas? It may be stupid to think that but people posted a couple days ago that Ira may join SI. Buckeye's first 2 posts were on this thread and he gave us hard to get information. JLebed

To: Buckeye who wrote (2553)	2/3/1998 10:23:00 PM
From: lowell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Buckeye: << I own a small company>> I too own a small company. << I would greatly resent the comment about being put in jail, if the shareholders did not receive their perceived value for their investment.>> My good man (or woman), everyone on this thread knows that they don't "cart CEOs off to prison" for misrepresenting earnings. A civil lawsuit would even be a tough task (One would probably have to prove that Ira knowingly lied about earnings - any lawyers out there?). Buckeye...Lighten up and go with the flow on this thread. <<This type of statement implies that the President is untruthful>> If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck.... <<It may be perceived as liable, could it be proven that such a statement undermined the share value>> I am very flattered that you think I can effect the share price of FAMH. Thank you! You really ought to see the movie The People Vs. Larry Flynt. It would teach you a little something about the 1st Amendment (and at the same time it might be very entertaining) Question: Does the money for you membership to SI come out of your own pocket or out of FAMH's shareholder equity?? Just curious.