Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Harvard Scientific (HVSF)Hot$$- male impotency medicine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: don roberson who wrote (2989)	2/3/1998 3:22:00 PM
From: jack w garnes jr.	Respond to of 3906

Hi Don!!! HAAAAAaaaaa!!! These people can't deal with this S---!!! HAAAaaaaaa!!! I told them to wait and see...But NOOOOOOOO!!! hell.. I may buy some of the stock....JG

To: don roberson who wrote (2989)	2/3/1998 3:25:00 PM
From: Tomas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3906

Damn. I figured we could have returned to $5 or $6, eventually, but $50 or $60 ???? I just don't see it. Not without some serious splits along the way. Damn. I understand their use of the 10:1, they wanted to keep it above $5 even with some set backs (above the old 50 cent level). The two things that have and will happen to this stock happened to another I own, QGLY. It did a reverse split a while back, couple of years ago or so, and gained NASDAQ small cap listing this year. The reverse split didn't kill it, don't know the details as I wasn't following it back in those days. The NASDAQ listing was touted as being the savings grace for the stock, I don't believe it moved it an 1/8th. With their track record I can't imagine listing will be any type of immediate infusion, at least from an honest standpoint. Tom