SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (171437)5/9/2021 7:58:00 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 219525
 
Too funny, as suspect Bloomberg spins up a nothing-burger

My comments, highlighted in red, and note that MSM journalism is shameless

bloomberg.com

China’s Much-Hyped Digital Yuan Fails to Impress Early Users

10 May 2021, 05:00 GMT+8
As China moves closer to rolling out the world’s first major sovereign digital currency, speculation over the global implications has reached a fever pitch.

Historian Niall Ferguson is calling the digital yuan a “potentially fatal challenge” to decades of American financial hegemony. Franklin Templeton’s Michael Hasenstab says it could undermine the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency. Joe Biden’s White House is studying the potential threat to U.S. interests.

Yet talk to people who’ve actually used the digital yuan in China, and you’re more likely to get a different response: shrugs of indifference. [TJ: Folks who are already used to use masks are going to be indifferent to a rule that makes mask-wearing a requirement, as in duh]

In Shenzhen, the high-tech metropolis that just extended China’s largest digital yuan trial, participants interviewed by Bloomberg showed little interest in switching from mobile payment systems run by Ant Group Co. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. that have already replaced cash in much of the country. Some balked at the possibility a digital yuan might give authorities easier access to real-time data on their financial lives. [TJ: Alipay and WeChatpay shall both work with eCNY, and privacy had not been a deciding issue on any of the payment systems ever]

“I’m not at all excited,” said Patricia Chen, a 36-year-old who works in the telecom industry and was one of the more than 500,000 people in Shenzhen eligible to take part in the trial. [TJ: Patricia is also not excited about spending cash]

While none of the seven participants who spoke to Bloomberg professed insight into the digital yuan’s future role in global foreign exchange markets, their lukewarm response underscores the challenge facing President Xi Jinping’s government as it lays the groundwork for adoption at home and abroad. [TJ: the seven interviewed intends to use eCNY as a matter of course and there is no response needed other than Luke warm, as in, "yeah, eCNY shall launch, why is Bloomberg excited?]

China's Digital Currency Experiment

bloom.bg (Source: Quicktake)

Even if authorities ultimately convince -- or compel -- citizens to embrace the digital yuan, it’s far from clear they can do the same with international consumers and businesses already wary of China’s capital controls, Communist Party-dominated legal system and state surveillance apparatus. [TJ: Aha, this is why Bloomberg is whistling in the dark towards TeoTwawKi]

Those are just some of the concerns that have capped the yuan’s share of global payments at around 3%, well below levels commensurate with China’s contribution to world trade and economic output. A digital version of the currency is unlikely to boost its share by much more than 1 percentage point, according to Zennon Kapron, managing director of Singapore-based consulting firm Kapronasia. [TJ: I can hardly get around Shenzhen using cash, and Kapronasia thinks eCNY shall only stretch use of RMB around the planet by 33% (1% added to 3%) - too funny. Always thought Singaporeans lack imagination]

“The global impact will be very small” barring structural changes to China’s economy and financial system, said Kapron, author of “Chomping at the Bitcoin: The Past, Present and Future of Bitcoin in China.” [TJ: interesting that Kapron thinks that eCNY does not foretell 'structural changes to China’s economy and financial system']

Many China watchers suspect Xi has high hopes for international use of the digital yuan as he tries to lessen his country’s reliance on the U.S.-led global financial system. But so far at least, Chinese policy makers have downplayed their ambitions in public. People’s Bank of China Deputy Governor Li Bo said last month that the digital yuan, also known as the e-CNY, is aimed at domestic useand isn’t meant to replace the dollar. [TJ: downplay ambitions is itself telling]

The project was started in 2014 by then-PBOC chief Zhou Xiaochuan, a longtime proponent of creating a new international reserve currency as an alternate to the dollar. Zhou saw the e-CNY as one way to fend off potential threats from digital currencies like Bitcoin or Facebook’s Diem (formerly called Libra). Chinese regulators, who banned cryptocurrency exchanges in 2017, have also said the digital yuan will help combat money laundering and increase financial inclusion.

Payment GiantsAnt Group and Tencent dominate China's mobile payment market

Source: iResearch

Note: data as of second quarter of 2020

Other use cases are more controversial. The reams of data produced by digital yuan transactions could give China’s central bank valuable real-time insights into the world’s second-largest economy; they might also be used by security services to monitor political dissidents or international businesses that compete with state-owned Chinese enterprises.

A programmable version of the currency allowing for expiration dates on stimulus payments could encourage spending during economic downturns -- or enable regulators to instantly turn off the e-wallet of anyone who runs afoul of Beijing. While global adoption of e-CNY could make cross-border payments cheaper and faster, it might also help the Communist Party weaken the impact of international sanctions. The PBOC has so far offered few details about how the e-CNY might be used overseas, other than to say it’s conducting cross-border tests with Hong Kong’s de-facto central bank.

The domestic trial that began in Shenzhen last month was by far China’s most ambitious to date. Participants who downloaded the government’s e-wallet app on their phones and linked it to their bank accounts could transfer as much as 10,000 yuan ($1,548) into e-CNY at a one-for-one rate. Similar to Ant’s Alipay and Tencent’s WeChat Pay, transfers using digital yuan take place almost instantly via QR code. They can also be conducted with near-field communication technology in the absence of an internet connection. [TJ: IOW, the trial is a success, and businesses carried on]

Using the digital yuan was easy enough for Vera Lin, a 25-year-old who works at a financial company in Shenzhen. At the same time, she said, incentives for making a permanent shift to e-CNY are lacking given China’s existing digital payment options are reliable and work seamlessly with other app-based services from social media to e-commerce platforms. [TJ: trial was for the infrastructure of the system. Use-case a matter of course. Incentives? How about a discount if eCNY is used, and a fine if cash is used? unless the user is 75 years and older, just for example, for arguments sake]

Even discounts of as much as 10% from merchants participating in the digital yuan trial weren’t enough to win Lin over. Platforms operated by companies like Ant routinely offer discounts on everything from ride-hailing services to grocery delivery. [TJ: phuck 'participating merchants'. How about a dictation of all merchants?]

Privacy concerns were among the turnoffs for Jan Chen, a 33-year-old civil servant. It’s “a little scary” that authorities might be able to trace every payment, she said. In a country where compliance with tax laws is often patchy, some merchants may also be wary of their transactions flowing directly into a government database. [TJ: That is part of the whole construct, for a fairer system that is transparent]

The PBOC has tried to quell those concerns by making the digital yuan free to use for merchants –- which currently pay service fees of around 0.6% for transactions on Alipay and WePay -- and by pledging that most payments will remain anonymous.

The central bank won’t directly know the identity of users, though the government would be able to get that information from financial institutions in cases of suspected illegal activity, Mu Changchun, director of the central bank’s Digital Currency Research Institute, said in March.

If the digital yuan fails to gain traction over the long term, China’s government might turn to coercion, according to Kapron. It has already started taking steps to assert more control over the data gathered by financial and tech companies including Ant and Tencent. “At the end of the day, I think it’s going to have to be the government saying: ‘You have to use this,’” Kapron said. [TJ: little need for coercion, except as spun by Bloomberg, because all shall use, given the stigma and inconvenience of cash. I felt out of place whenever navigating Shenzhen, having to go to special dedicated counter to get subway ticket when everybody else zipping through to catch their ride]

Even if policy makers don’t go that far, they may ask merchants and Internet platform operators to add the digital yuan to their suite of payment options, according to Francis Chan, a senior analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence. Others have suggested the government might start paying civil servants’ salaries in e-CNY. [TJ: Why would merchants not offer eCNY as payment option once WeChat and Alipay and and and all flip?! Only in Bloomberg wonderland do merchants make it difficult for customers to pay]

Chan and fellow BI analyst Sharnie Wong predict the digital yuan will be in use nationwide before the Beijing Olympics in 2022 and comprise 9% of China’s domestic digital payments by 2025. That’s no small change, but still a long way from challenging the dominance of Alipay and WePay, which are estimated to have a combined market share of more than 90%. [TJ: hilarious that Bloomberg believes Alipay and WeChatpay will not pivot to eCNY]

Persuading the world to embrace the digital yuan will be even harder. “The e-CNY addresses just one layer of it, the payment infrastructure part,” said Michael Ho, principal of financial services at Oliver Wyman. “But just tacking on this one layer will not solve the entire puzzle.” [TJ: try, "from now on all China-originating rare earths transactions around the planet between any two parties must be conducted in eCNY, and this point forward all China imports of goods and services shall enjoy expedited clearance if conducted in eCNY."]

— With assistance by Allen K Wan, Amanda Wang, Yujing Liu, and Zheping Huang

[TJ: cretin, moron, imbecile, and dullard, take notes on journalism]

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (171437)5/9/2021 8:52:46 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 219525
 
The energy is bad entertainment when put on by those who shield war criminals

The eventual comedown shall be unseemly for some and fun for others

economist.com

Australia’s debate about China is becoming hot, angry and shrill

The increasingly one-sided discourse helps no one

May 8th 2021

CHINA’S COMMUNIST PARTY has given Australians plenty to be dismayed about, from its vituperative anger when the Dalai Lama visits, to buying off Australian politicians, to trying to influence academic research at Australia’s universities. China is not best pleased, either. In an extraordinary outpouring of bile last year, the Chinese embassy in Canberra enumerated 14 grievances against Australia. These included the passing of a law against foreign interference in politics and calling for an independent international inquiry into the murky origins of the novel coronavirus. Putting Australia firmly on the naughty step, China has blocked a raft of Australian exports to China, the unlucky country’s biggest trading partner.

Australia long needed a public debate about China, but politicians were loth to broach one. Even as China’s power and reach grew under President Xi Jinping, Australia’s leaders, and voters, were happy striking an awkward balance in which it got its prosperity from China—through vast exports of iron ore and coal and imports of Chinese students—and its security from an America-led order. But, given Chinese rage, having it both ways is no longer an option.

The government of Scott Morrison, prime minister since 2018, relishes calling China out. By now, though, the rhetorical flourishes are starting to sound as though it were girding for war. Mr Morrison says Australia must speak with “one voice” on foreign policy, as if scrappy debate was uncalled for, or even unpatriotic. The new defence secretary, Peter Dutton, told the Sydney Morning Herald ( SMH) that Australia was “already under attack” in the cyber domain. He warned that a war over Taiwan could not be discounted and that the priority was defending Australia’s waters. A senior civil servant, Michael Pezzullo, weighed in with talk of the “drums of war”, pointing the finger at China without naming it.

Yet if war is not actually imminent, which it is not, then the government line is not helpful. Natasha Kassam of the Lowy Institute, a Sydney think-thank, argues in the Guardian that while the reasons for talking about regional challenges are sound, “there are also real risks…from causing panic and hysteria.” Not even Taiwan talks of imminent war.

Kevin Rudd, a former prime minister and cogent observer of China’s rise, goes further. Australia’s “highly problematic” relationship with China is certainly because of Mr Xi’s much more assertive posture. But it is also, Mr Rudd argues in the SMH, because Mr Morrison and his team “are addicted to the drug of ‘standing up to China’.”That may play well at home, but “the public language on China, Taiwan and the possibility of war…serves zero national security purpose.”

What is more, the line from Canberra poisons a wider domestic discourse over China, in which those arguing for engagement, nuance or open debate are shouted down. A furore erupted when Jane Golley, a prominent academic at the Australian National University, argued that debates about China were being stifled by a “dominant narrative”. She was perhaps unwise to choose the topic of China’s brutal treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang, which she does not contest, as her example. But the outcry seemed to bear out her broader point.

Separately, a researcher and prolific tweeter at the Parliamentary Library, Geoff Wade, has claimed widespread Communist Party influence over Australian life. When a handful of commentators, including one with former business ties to China, challenged the basis of his claims, Mr Wade issued defamation suits against them. James Paterson, a senator who is part of a group of China hawks in Parliament, claimed Mr Wade was the object of “state-backed coercion”. (Also without evidence, Mr Wade’s critics counter that murky forces are paying for his legal campaign.)

One veteran Canberra hand describes a dangerous “ideological intolerance” in which moderate voices are drowned out and the debate about China is reduced to emotion. Another senator, Eric Abetz, last year even called on Chinese-Australians appearing before his committee to denounce the Communist Party. That points to a further risk, says Greg Barns, a lawyer: pinko paranoia plays to a xenophobic, racist undercurrent that has long run through Australian life.

Such an undercurrent risks resurfacing if Chinese-Australians face questions or abuse about their loyalty. If the hawks’ tactics end up making Australia seem a less civil, tolerant or welcoming place, then the country will be the poorer for it.

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline "Closing argument"



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (171437)5/10/2021 1:56:44 AM
From: Sultan1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Cogito Ergo Sum

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219525
 
lol




To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (171437)5/10/2021 2:07:44 PM
From: sense  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219525
 
... AND I will reiterate most Canadian conservatives are FAR from US Tea party stock.. but are pilloried as such... They are more like moderate GOPs..which do exist... but the fact remains the current crop at the conservative helm are dopes.. do not deserve a vote..

You think maybe there's a connection... between compromising principles before engaging the debate... and "moderate" leadership... that is in fact nothing but compromised ?

Grow a pair speak truth...

Lauren Southern for PM...