Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : YURI ( YURI SYSTEM ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SteveG who wrote (371)	2/3/1998 3:47:00 PM
From: Alex Chilton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1181

SteveG: <..I haven't seen so much corporate drivel come from one individual in a long time...> keep the drivel coming. afa the ciscoMC3810 (not shipping), it should be price competitive, and cisco can sell, but the Yuri LDR5 will be functionally greater and more flexible for more applications. this is my expectation. Alex.

To: SteveG who wrote (371)	2/3/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: SJSharky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1181

I haven't seen so much corporate drivel come from one individual in a long time. Just to let you know, Steve, your comments are appreciated. For a non-tech beanie-counter type, I can analyze financials, but have a hard time with the complex technical stuff. Its nice to get some technical commentary...good or bad news. Stock keeps moving up...hard to tell if its in anticipation of earnings release or maybe some of the shorts covering...in any event, its been nice the last couple of days. --Ryan

To: SteveG who wrote (371)	2/3/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: Capitalist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1181

>>That may well be. I understand from good sources that LU wanted to buy YURI, and when they couldn't, tried unsuccessfully to build a sub 2Mbps product. So now they OEM for YURI (at better margins than YURI's previous arrangement with T)<< Where did you hear of this? I've never heard any such report that LU tried to buy them and then unsuccessfully attempted at sub-2Mbps products. Please post a link, if it's just a rumor (which I believe it is), it is probably false. Regards, SH