SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (171489)5/12/2021 5:47:02 AM
From: sense1 Recommendation

Recommended By
pak73

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218238
 
The Nazi's were also very successful economically... and turned the German economy around in record time after the humiliation of their defeat in WW I.

The argument that national socialism "works" to foster greater economic success as an alternative in the absence of other successful organizing principles... isn't the point ?

National socialism is vastly more functional economically than communism... or of the basic anarchy that tends to rule more than ideology in failed states.

But it doesn't REMAIN more functional... once the original deficits imposed (by communism or war) are overcome...

And, that's not just about China... even if it is more true of China than others in terms of starting from an economic blank slate. But "globalism" is both the product of and the driver of a global adoption of National Socalism... that has as its primary outcome... a huge ramp up in the inebitability of war... driven by the parallel inevitablity of the FAILED CHARACTER of socialism... its lack of accountability... (fake elections and all) which doesn't make the world a better place... when greater wealth and power proceed from lifting people out of poverty, first... and then from making them wealthy... to making them belligerent... while elevating and rewarding the worst society produces... as happened in Germany in WWII... as has happened now in China under Xi... and, I would argue... is no less true in Europe and the U.S., even if the "tendency" is somewhat moderated by a different legacy than in China or the developing world.

Blinken's obvious hypocisy... is a proof of exactly that... in a government that postures as if they are somehow representing the legacy of JFK... while JFK is rolling over in his grave as the monsterous thing the National Socialist Deep State and its tech company / media shills have made of the U.S.

Europe under the E.U. is close to not worth saving... and I think we're going to see what happens as Europe fails soon enough. With a long memory of life under independent states... I don't think Europe is doomed to plunge into a new dark age... but, that potential does exist... in the inherently bureaucratic and unaccountable governing structures of the EU... if it is that ionly that survives in the wake of failure.

The U.S. has been through civil wars before... and clearly is headed toward another... the divisions fanned by the media and their globalist / national socialist friends around the world... and by politicians unwilling to accept the will of the people or the outcome of elections conducted without fraud...

China will have its own problems... when China's economy fails... as it is likely to do when global trade grinds to a sudden halt... which it will do the moment a war begins...

And, with events in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and in the border regions between China and India, with events in the Black Sea and Ukraine, and a war already started in Israel... with numerous ongoing Iranian provocations in other areas... and with the cyber attack conducted on the United States this week... which I fully expect will result in a kinetic response... don't forget... as the world has not... that Xi chose to shut down travel in China to protect Bejing, while deliberately spreading the virus to the rest of the world... which has lit a slow fuze in anger that is still building... as Xi's choices have alienated every nation, and made China their enemy.

As far as China... it is Xi who is responsible more than others for obviously brain dead inept choices... but, just as Hilter was similarly responsible in Germany in WWII... and made similarly brain dead inept choices... that tendency to pairing up "the wrong people in charge" together with "zero practical ability to resist the wrong people in charge"... forces an awareness of that being one of the worst features of National Socialism... compared to every other system... even including communism... whose intrinsic failures help to prevent it becoming too much of a threat to themselves and others... which National Socialism inevitably does...

So, there will be a war... although by now people know better than to pretend it will end all wars... rather than it being "just another one... quite like the ones before it... only monstrously worse".

The Bill Gates crowd of National Socialists with the resurrected eugenicist bent paired with the presumed superiority of knowing better than others... and acting for them... appear on track to achieve their plan for "sustainability"... by culling the larger part of the current world population... over the next few years.

That should set a good tone for the market action later this morning ?