Re << six months of immunity >> or no immunity or maybe perhaps possibly immunity with complications, or by chance, everything-good / all-ok immunity, or ...
whatever the case it is looking more if-ish by the news flow, even as commands from up on high commands with authority for no particular upside reason, if correct, what's the big deal, and if wrong, dead wrong ...
In the meantime and on another front ... I have no comment for the below article headline speaks loudly, that SAT / ACT is racially biased. The Coconut, being tri-racial at the very least, scored perfect scores, and so we cannot ascertain which DNA is for what section of the exams.
Tonight is her junior prom night, no dancing allowed, and the kids shall chat, listen to music, play table games, and hangout, but in formal attire. The coconut shall don a Grace Kelly grey satin gown complemented w/ highlights from the Claude Monet trinkets collection from FreyWillie. Got school e-mail re her course scheduled for the coming senior year, and I do not know what "VADT FOUNDATION (S1)" so shall find out. I have not kept track of her schooling as I am Jack's. She has likely scored another 4.0 per raising kids easy. We might move her into a service apartment for a few weeks over the summer so that she has to take care of herself.
"Here is a list of the courses, in alphabetical and term order, you will take for the school year 2021-2022:AP CALC AB (21-22)AP ENG LIT (21-22)AP EUROPEAN HISTORY (21-22)AP PHYSICS 2 (21-22)PE 12 (21-22)GRADE 12 TRANSITIONS SEMINAR (Q1)SPIRITUAL EXPLORATION 12 (Q2)SPIRITUAL EXPLORATION 12 (Q3)GRADE 12 TRANSITIONS SEMINAR (Q4)FORENSIC SCIENCE (S1)VADT FOUNDATION (S1)AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS (S2)"
bloomberg.com
University of California Set to Drop SAT, ACT Through 2025
Maeve Allsup
15 May 2021, 05:22 GMT+8
The University of California system agreed Friday to extend its court-mandated policy of test-free admissions through 2025, according to advocacy groups that argue the use of SAT and ACT scores discriminates against applicants based on race, income, and disability.
The university regents previously announced a test-optional policy while the system created a new type of test that it said will better align with the content it expects students to master.
Some campuses opted to immediately eliminate the use of test scores, while others decided to phase them out.
Students and groups sued the university in 2020, alleging the test-optional policy denies applicants with disabilities access to the benefit of the plus-factor that test scores provide, in part because they haven’t taken the tests and won’t be able to take them with necessary accommodations during the pandemic.
The Alameda County Superior Court granted a preliminary injunction in August, noting the pandemic restrictions were particularly difficult on people with disabilities. The order blocked schools from considering standardized test scores while the lawsuit was pending, preventing their use for the Fall 2021 admissions process.
The settlement extends that policy. SAT and ACT scores, if submitted by students, won’t be provided to admissions readers, the settlement says.
It also “ensures that the University will not revert to its planned use of the SAT and ACT—which its own Regents have admitted are racist metrics—and that the University’s doors will remain open to the students who stand to benefit the most from public higher education,” Public Counsel attorney Amanda Savage said in a statement.
Existing UC policy allows students previously denied admission to any UC campus to present information related to a disability, if they believe it’s relevant to their appeal, the settlement says. And if the university creates a new exam, it will consider access for students with disabilities in its design and implementation.
In January, the UC system announced applicant data for the Fall 2021 admissions cycle, which indicated its campuses received higher numbers of applicants from first-generation students, Black students, and Latino students than ever before.
“The makeup of this year’s applicants already show that students are no longer deterred from applying based on their inability to access standardized testing,” Potomac Law Group attorney Marci Lerner Miller, who represented the plaintiffs. “We’re confident that this settlement will lead to students demonstrating their abilities, rather than their disabilities, in the application process. We’re very proud of the students and organizations that bravely came forward to fight this battle, this victory belongs to them.”
The University of California strongly disagreed with the superior court’s decision to grant an injunction, it told Bloomberg Law in response to a request for comment. It filed an appeal at that time, and also began exploring the possibility of a settlement “that would provide certainty for students and their families, counselors, and high schools.” The UC Board of Regents approved the settlement May 13.
“Under the terms of the settlement, the University has agreed not to consider applicants’ SAT or ACT scores in admissions or scholarship decisions for fall 2022. The Board of Regents had already decided in May 2020 that SAT or ACT scores would not be considered for fall 2023 admissions and beyond.”
The plaintiffs were represented by Public Counsel; Equal Justice Society; Brown, Goldstein & Levy LLP; Winston & Strawn LLP; Olivarez Madruga Lemieux O’Neill LLP; and Potomac Law Group. Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP and the University of California’s Office of the General Counsel represented UC.
The case is Smith v. Regents of Univ. of Calif., Cal. Super. Ct., No. RG19046222, 5/14/21.
To contact the reporter on this story: Maeve Allsup in San Francisco at mallsup@bloomberglaw.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rob Tricchinelli at rtricchinelli@bloomberglaw.com
(Updates story to include response from University of California in paragraphs eleven and twelve.)
Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE |
