SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1301480)5/22/2021 4:33:04 PM
From: Winfastorlose1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Respond to of 1575761
 
So what is your point? It is as I said, except now they want to experiment on children as well. Even though children do not really have a problem with Covid at all.

Why would you ever trust the government to level with you? They have not earned anyone's trust. Trust your good common sense first and foremost.

A Case in Point

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male [1] [2] [3] (informally referred to as the "Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment," the "Tuskegee Syphilis Study," the "Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the African American Male," the "U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee," or the "Tuskegee Experiment") was an ethically abusive study conducted between 1932 and 1972 by the United States Public Health Service (PHS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). [4] [5] The purpose of this study was to observe the natural history of untreated syphilis. Although the African-American men who participated in the study were told that they were receiving free health care from the federal government of the United States, they were not. [6]

The Public Health Service started the study in 1932 in collaboration with Tuskegee University (then the Tuskegee Institute), a historically black college in Alabama. In the study, investigators enrolled a total of 600 impoverished African-American sharecroppers from Macon County, Alabama. [6] Of these men, 399 had latent syphilis, with a control group of 201 men who were not infected. [5] As an incentive for participation in the study, the men were promised free medical care, but were deceived by the PHS, who never informed subjects of their diagnosis [7] [8] [9] [10] and disguised placebos, ineffective methods, and diagnostic procedures as treatment. [11]

The men were initially told that the "study" was only going to last six months, but it was extended to 40 years. [5] After funding for treatment was lost, the study was continued without informing the men that they would never be treated. None of the infected men were treated with penicillin despite the fact that by 1947, the antibiotic was widely available and had become the standard treatment for syphilis. [12]

The study continued, under numerous Public Health Service supervisors, until 1972, when a leak to the press resulted in its termination on November 16 of that year. [13] The study caused the deaths of 128 of its participants, either directly from syphilis or related complications. [14]

At the study’s commencement, major medical textbooks had recommended that all syphilis be treated, as the consequences were quite severe. At that time, treatment included treatment with arsenic-based compounds such as arsphenamine (branded as the "606" formula). [4] Initially, subjects were studied for six to eight months and then treated with contemporary methods, including Salvarsan ("606,") mercurial ointments, and bismuth, which were mildly effective and highly toxic. [6] Additionally, men in the study were administered disguised placebos, ineffective methods, and diagnostic procedures, which were misrepresented as treatments for syphilis and/or "bad blood." [11]

en.wikipedia.org



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1301480)5/22/2021 11:05:42 PM
From: Winfastorlose2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575761
 
Here is an interview with Michael Yeadon, former Vice President and Chief Science Officer of Pfizer, where he worked for 16 years. He was also a CEO of a biotech company.

If you want to understand the science with respect to the PFE and MRNA vaccines, as well as all of the rest of the current narrative involving Covid19, this guy is as "science as it gets". He is not a politician. He is a top scientist with much experience in the world of pharmaceutical giants.

A few minutes of this interview may cut though some of the confusion and misconceptions that many people have with respect to virology and Covid19 infections.

rumble.com



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (1301480)5/23/2021 6:08:18 PM
From: Winfastorlose2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575761
 
NBC glorifies kids getting other kids vaxxed against parents’ wishes…

CDC: Vaxxed kids are getting heart problems, don’t know why…