To: TobagoJack who wrote (172327 ) 5/25/2021 10:50:40 PM From: sense Respond to of 220567 I think that is true of the intial round of experimental vaccines... particularly all of those that included targetting of the spike proteins. The spike proteins now appear, in themselves, to be a part of the problems that people have with the virus... so, for those people who are reactive... the injection of attenuated spike proteins is just as much of a potential problem as getting the virus... I think it was May-June last year before analysis of live virus genome provided the first really viable targets for vaccine development... those not addressing the oddities of the Sars CoV2... but addressing the common root patterns shared between many related Corona viruses... so "inert" but widely shared sequences being queued up for immune system targetting... has a much better chance of not only limiting the risks in the immediately negative impacts of getting the shot... but also should be more functional in avoiding cross-site suppression...(making you more vulnerable to future infections)... while actually providing a larger measure of immunity, against many corona virus variants, rather than only symptom suppression, which seems it is all that the current generation provide... The officaldom... have gotten just about everything wrong that you could get wrong in addressing Sars CoV2... And that continues now... with the incorrect policy that "if you got the shot, you don't need to wear a mask"... when the shot does not a damn thing to prevent transmission... meaning that policy choice is ont that (they know) accelerates transmission... in a population converted into living petri dishes for the development of variants that are unphased by the vaccines they've used... The policy creates new variants that the shot won't constrain... expanding the risk of a mid-course variant that is more lethal emerging... as happened with Spanish Flu back in the day... Worse, of course...or just as bad... is all the bullshit about having to wear a mask at all...back when they claimed they were essential... but never bothered to require use of masks that ACTUALLY WORK... If they did birth control the same way... we'd have a global population explosion going on now... My family all have been issued N100 masks... that work... A side benefit... is that they're spectacular for filtering out allergens... even perfumes... smoke... fine particulates from sanding, or some volatiles from painting... as well as viruses... So, its actually useful to have around. So, why didn't they ever ramp up production of N100 masks... that actually work ? Why did they push N95 masks... that don't work ? I don't think you can separate the "policy choices" from the "origins" question... and they continue issuing policy guidance that is the exact opposite of what the science requires... as they have from the start. If you ever wondered why it is that the greatest risk of death among sick people results from... hospitals... now you know why... ?