SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Joe Biden -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (1956)5/25/2021 1:28:16 PM
From: Jamie153  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12185
 
For the virus to be man made and accidentally released a lot of scientists would have had to die fast. It only takes days. If it was released on purpose, why did they tell the WHO and the US about it?

They think like children.



To: combjelly who wrote (1956)5/25/2021 1:42:52 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12185
 
Id "all" the available evidence showed it evolved naturally, then it would be current scientific fact. However, ALL the evidence doesn't indicate that t all.
===

"Speaking on the issue of destroyed credibility over early Wuhan reporting and CCP apologists is retired New York Times science editor, Nicholas Wade, who slammed the MSM on Sunday for failing to investigate the origins of COVID-19.

According to Wade, the media failed to "take off its political glasses" and see beyond facts which are being obscured by the Chinese Communist Party.

"'I think we see a sustained Chinese propaganda effort at work," said Wade, who was a staff writer for the Science Times section of the NYT from 1982 to 2012, in an interview with Mark Levin on "Life, Liberty & Levin."

"But, you know, more than that, it was just the blindness, if I could put it that way, of our media — we're too polarized to see scientific issues for their own sake without putting a political gloss on them," Wade continued. "We don't know for sure: The origin of the virus is just we've got these two possible scenarios. But if you look at all the evidence and ask yourself, well, which scenario explains all these facts better on present evidence, it seems, to me at least, that the lab-escape hypothesis explains it a lot better."

"But it's a sort of complicated conclusion to arrive at, and I can only assume that the media was blindsided, they didn't do the work that was necessary."

Let's not mince words Wade, the Media opposed the lab leak theory because President Trump promoted it, and the CCP has its tentacles deeply embedded in American propagandists who breathlessly peddle their talking points."




To: combjelly who wrote (1956)5/25/2021 10:10:53 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12185
 
It is clear that when Trump stated the facts, it should not have been shut down. If you can’t admit that you’re not even trying to be honest.