SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (172436)5/28/2021 11:15:52 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217593
 
Re <<I am a bit overweight on CSPR. Looking at all the news …>>

It might be the case that for the foreseeable future there is no such thing as ‘overweight’ in Casper.

That which news-flows well and going up can not be categorized as ‘overweight’ :0)

What happens if say for example a sovereign nation dictates that all its block-chain needs be sated by developments hubbed on Casper and companies servicing such sovereign nation then works on such apps and sell to other customers as well?

I wonder if the fellows and fellowettes of Casper can light that fire.

We wait to see.

In the meantime I bought more Casper just now. It is cheap, and remain in line w/ BTC and ETH.

I do wonder about the link between adoption and trading pricing. The link is not direct, and linkage not obvious.



To: maceng2 who wrote (172436)5/29/2021 12:46:21 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
maceng2

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217593
 
On this below article's take of crypto in China,

at 10% for <<“one-knife-cut” solution is too dramatic to execute.>>

at 40% for <<“big thunder little rain”>>

at 50% for <<Slow Estrangement>>

I believe none of the above will happen, and that China shall go-go-go on crypto blockchain per call of duty by Xi Jinping of the CCP scmp.com "What Xi Jinping’s blockchain advocacy means for China – and the world"

The recent days FUD as spun by MSM is not only slightly wrong but completely wrong. The diametrically wrongness is awesomely amazing.

I do not know how much more transparent China might be besides making known details to 5-years plans and following up with definitive statements by the leadership:

(i) going for blockchain
(ii) no ICO as mechanism to raise money
(iii) no speculation on exchanges
(iv) no abetting by banks
(v) less mining

The fact that others choose to treat the above (i) - (v) as mutually incompatible is just wrong.
As many are expecting a ferocious weekend trading of cryptos in general and bitgold in particular, I have added GTC at 0.25 and 0.20 to the Caspers I added this morning.

decrypt.co

Here’s How China’s Crypto FUD Will Play Out

China has renewed its apparent negativity toward crypto. Here are three scenarios for what might happen next.

By Shuyao Kong

For hundreds of years preceding the early 20th century, China’s emperors banned international trade and cloistered the country from the rest of the world. The so-called “closed-door” policy (????) was partly a response to the Opium Wars with the British, who had been ruthlessly peddling the drug throughout the previous century and had addicted as many as 12 million people in the country.

Though crypto is hardly as addictive as opium, the current regime in China appears to be treating it with similar contempt.

Last week, Vice Premier Liu He, who also leads the State Council, explicitly denounced crypto mining and trading as a financial risk that would destabilize the country’s economy. As a result, large crypto mining firms halted operations and began to look for new homes abroad. Huobi and OKEx, two of the largest exchanges that serve investors in China, also suspended pool mining and leveraged trading activities there.

Is this the beginning of the “Crypto Wars” in China? Or is it just another example of the FUD that tends to waylay every crypto bull run? This week’s da bing examines both Liu’s statement and reaction from the local crypto community, and proposes three plausible scenarios for how it all will play out.

Scenario 1: Completely outlaw cryptoThe obliteration of China’s “official” crypto industry (save for retail investors and others using VPN to avoid the Great Firewall) is certainly possible. The central government could issue a country-wide ban on mining and trading. Policies would then be enacted that strip mining farms of their licenses and punish those who are currently operating under the guise of “cloud computing centers.”

Get top stories as they break and join the conversation by following us on TwitterIf this occurs, we would expect to see a crackdown on Huobi and OKEx, given that both exchanges are headquartered in Beijing, less than an hour drive from where President Xi himself lives.

True, crypto is still a small player in China’s fintech scene and the government has bigger fish, such as Alibaba and Tencent, to worry about. But crypto could be far more of a long-term threat than Alibaba and Tencent. After all, the government can easily control Alibaba by silencing Jack Ma, but it cannot effortlessly silence crypto once it goes big. Governments, more than anyone else in the world, know that crypto is a rabbit hole that will take many beyond the initial gambling stage to an open, censorship-resistant, decentralized world. And that’s especially scary to the CCP.

Even worse: Unbridled, “real” crypto could well be viewed as a competitive and confusing threat to China’s ongoing effort to establish its own digital currency. As China’s DCEP continues to mature, any financial primitive that de-legitimizes it will be viewed as a threat to China’s digital yuan campaign. Plus crypto has been facilitating unwanted capital outflow, which is another thorn in the government’s eye.

Nonetheless, many observers see this full-on, kill crypto and salt-the-earth scenario as unlikely, because after tolerating crypto for over a decade, such a “one-knife-cut” solution is too dramatic to execute. And I tend to agree.

Da Bing's best guess: 20% likely to happen

Scenario 2: Big Thunder, Little Rain???,??? ( “big thunder little rain”) is a phrase that describes policy statements that sound ambitious but are followed by little action. If this scenario plays out, then Premier Liu’s statement would be the last words we hear from the government. There won’t be additional concrete directives from the central government to provincial governments forcing a crackdown on crypto activities.

More importantly, there won’t be any KPIs against which provincial governments would be measured. This is key because, in the absence of directives, provincial governments are unlikely to punish crypto miners. After all, miners have been operating peacefully in the country for a decade. They’ve developed cordial relationships with local governments and have been paying good tax money.

If this scenario plays out, then Premier Liu’s statement can be viewed as getting in line with China’s commitment to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. The country has resolved to wipe out any blockers that prevent it from achieving that goal and becoming greener. And bitcoin mining, unfortunately, is one of those blockers.

As a result, we might see coal-powered mining farms largely disappear, while those powered by clean energy might be allowed to stay in operation. Crypto exchanges would also be fine other than shutting down their pool mining operations, which account for only a fraction of their revenue anyway.

Da bing's best guess: 40% likely to happen

Scenario 3: Slow Estrangement As China-based crypto VC Matthew Graham told me: “We certainly hold the view that Liu He's comments indicate that the Chinese government has concerns about excessive speculation, including in crypto. We can anticipate that the government will be taking a ‘close look’ at this issue.”

Here, a “close look” could mean that the government will continue to take measured steps to tackle the danger of crypto going mainstream, short of actually outlawing it.

It might start with cracking down on coal-powered mining operations, and then slowly hydrogen-powered mining operations, and then spread to hobbling CPU-powered mining operations (for instance, Filecoin and Chia).

Huobi and OKEx have already shut down pool mining and leveraged trading features to Chinese users. Other features such as OTC trading could be of imminent danger, too.

This scenario is perhaps the most dangerous one because it spreads the pain out for the foreseeable future. The market has no visibility to future policy and can only react passively.

Many crypto entrepreneurs have seen such a risk and have either exited China or prepared an escape route.

Da bing's best guess: 50% likely to happen

Crypto isn't opium



As Graham observed, the crypto community gave a “fear-driven emphasis” to Liu’s statement. But it’s not fear that’s the problem; it’s uncertainty. If the government is clear about its intentions and direction, the community can figure out a way to cope.

The bigger problem--for the government at least--is that ???? might not work this time. China’s citizens easily and routinely circumvent via VPN the Great Firewall to access Google, Wikipedia and all the other things the government is trying to close off. They will find ways to access to foreign exchanges and participate in DeFi if major exchanges are banned. (Though granted, finding an off ramp to convert crypto into yuan in a Chinese bank account will be trickier.)

And if China’s miners disappear? That could well be a good thing for crypto, making the blockchain more decentralized and anti-fragile.

But it sort of breaks my heart. If crypto leaves China, a generation of hungry and smart entrepreneurs will miss out on a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to build and create wealth on a nascent, global, borderless platform. Everyone loses in that scenario.

Crypto isn’t opium. The benefits of opening it up to China’s investors and entrepreneurs ought to be obvious.

Did you know??????? which means “hanging the head of a sheep but selling dog meat” is a colorful way to describe merchants who advertise one commodity but sell something different. In the case of mining, many miners have been accused of branding themselves as big data centers—but are actually burning coal to mine Internet money.



To: maceng2 who wrote (172436)5/29/2021 2:12:58 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217593
 
I continue to struggle w/ the idea of network adoption and token value, but in the meantime taking it on faith



this below if free from behind normally up paywall is fun. Anders, like Gary Gensler, also taught at MIT

realvision.com