Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (172598)	5/31/2021 11:52:07 AM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217588

Yes it does. There since the dam was built. Which isn't relevant to the question of whether or not there is surplus potential not being exploited... or a sufficient height differential to enable its being exploited ? There are lot of dams built in the 1940's to the 1960's that "could be more efficient" ? Note the issue as a parallel to other social issues... in which some will always find that the "only possible solution" to a problem... has to be a massive centrally directed and controlled project... Three Gorges... rather than "micro-hydro" ? The issue is about "how you think" rather than "what works best" in the sense of optimal solutions... So, what happens IF you don't impose central control and thus insane control freaks... along with a requirement for sub-optimal scaling undertaken mostly in order to empower them ? Power issues... mostly intended to enslave you to the grid... have an entering argument that assumes the centralized imposition of that slavery is both "a good thing" and an efficiency... when neither is true.