Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (201207)	6/4/2021 3:32:45 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 363341

I am just trying to make sense of it. Possession of 5 pounds is going to have "with intent to distribute" tacked on almost everywhere. Hard to imagine that wasn't a felony. Especially back then, unless he is a lot older than he seems. Now maybe he was able to plea to a lesser charge, but what could that have been? I suppose it is possible he got a deferred adjudication with his record wiped after his probation was served. But it still seems that ethically he would have to admit to the arrest and probation on that form even if the records are sealed. That is assuming that ethics is something other than 7 letter word to him.