SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Tricon (YUM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: felix who wrote (30)2/3/1998 11:13:00 PM
From: Michael Burry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67
 
Re: the article

Joel said he was starting to look at Tricon now, but initially
he shied away because it had such a following and so many
analysts. He didn't disagree with analyzing Tricon as a spinoff
but he said "that isn't what I was trying to do with the book"
due to Tricon's popularity.

I guess I would say I am confused by this aspect. The idea
is that spinoffs tend to fall initially as people dump shares
irrationally. This shouldn't be affected by the size or the
relative non-obscurity of Tricon. In the days that led up to
the spinoff, Barron's, the WSJ, and several leading money management
firms all panned Tricon. My guess is that it would've fallen a lot
further if Julian Robertson wasn't in there buying up 11% of the
company.

And analysts are generally apathetic towards it - I couldn't
find many that thought it was a particularly good buy. It
is telling that DLJ, when it downgraded the stock in January,
mentioned the "rough 6 months ahead" whereas UBS when it
upgraded the stock said "12 months from now, its troubles should
be behind it."

In general, this is a stock where a long-term view gets
you a bargain and a short term view may net losses. I've
taken a full position at 26.25 in one of the portfolios
I manage - it can be viewed at sealpoint.com

I am hoping for more bad news/a share fall so that I may
pick up additional shares in other portfolios.

Good Investing,
Mike