SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Hemlock(GHE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hugh M. who wrote (700)2/3/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: snorkel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 909
 
As I see it the price was changed for the benifit of the insiders which is BS. When we lost our ass with ghe, did we get to change our amount? NO TAKE YOUR :LUMPS LIKE THE REST OF US anter all we OWN the company too.



To: Hugh M. who wrote (700)2/3/1998 11:19:00 PM
From: Robert Dydo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 909
 
I disagree as this fragment states:
"The VSE has imposed the condition that, in the case where warrant
holders elect to take advantage of the reduced exercise price, and should
the company's shares trade on the VSE for ten consecutive trading days at
an average price of $0.25 per share or greater, the warrant holders must
exercise their warrants within 30 calendar days or the warrant will expire
at the end of those 30 days."
The question is not about financial gain or loss but why and for who's interest? It would seem like it is benefitting company as long as 10 days will hold. It does mean that would happen now or even in six months if one day will fall below the average 0.25 in 10 day period. In such a case the warrants will not be exercised and money will be gone or they will be exercised at the original price. I think this clause is preventing repricing of the warrants in case price would fall to lower level. If this happens company can't change the application but to make it fair there is the chance of 10 days given by VSE. This makes only sense.
Robert