Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Angel D who wrote (40185)	2/3/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Angel, If you will check around, you will find that this is a pretty standard letter used by the SEC in this situation. I think the wording of a letter from the SEC does require careful analysis and I think the wording in this letter is very clear. Back to you. TC

To: Angel D who wrote (40185)	2/3/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 55532

Angel: That is proper wording. The SEC writes very well. Tell me are you more concerned with the manner in which messages are written, than the content. If you had been doing your DD as you claim, you would have read the letter at the SEC site. That would have left little doubt as to it's authenticity. People could learn so much if they actually read letters and articles, rather than determining if they like them or not due to the content or the author. What good does it do you to try and demean the SEC letter. Do you have concern for it's content? TG

To: Angel D who wrote (40185)	2/3/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: Ditchdigger	Respond to of 55532

< I think the constant reference to it is irrellevant.> <ROFL!!> goodnight,DD PS: that letter is the reason you are sitting on "chilled" money..