SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ggersh who wrote (172912)6/7/2021 7:44:24 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219459
 
we in hk face a choice, get vaccinated now, before 15th July, or consider later, but less one vaccine (Pfizer) choice

my family and I shall hold out until September once flu season about to open

calibrated approach



To: ggersh who wrote (172912)6/7/2021 9:17:38 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219459
 
<<truth serum>> ...

wondering why such are hitting the front pages

who benefits and hurts?

bloomberg.com

Boeing Charged Japan 1,500% Markup on Plane Part, Air Force Says
Anthony Capaccio
8 June 2021, 08:30 GMT+8
Boeing Co. charged the Japanese government an “excessive” price for some spare parts for its refueling tanker plane, as much as 16 times more than the U.S. Air Force paid for its latest versions, according to a service assessment.

In one example involving an April $79 million spare parts contract for the KC-46 tanker, Japan was billed for navigation lights made by subcontractor Honeywell Inc. “at a unit price more than 1,500% above the previous unit price,” according to the previously undisclosed Air Force summary prepared last month.

From November 2019 until March of this year, the U.S. Air Force tried, without success, to “secure adequate pricing information” from Boeing to determine whether the price for the lights and other parts in the package was fair and reasonable under federal regulations, according to the summary.

“The Air Force was unable to determine that approximately $10 million of the total contract price was fair and reasonable primarily due to the lack of information to support cost or price analysis related to commercial spares,” spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said in an email statement.

The Boeing-Japan case is the latest example of military contracting officials having difficulty compelling contractors to provide backup data for parts classified as “commercial items,” such as the navigation lights.

Air Force Holds Back $336 Million on Flawed Boeing Tanker

The Air Force manages contracting for Japan’s four KC-46 tankers, but the Japanese government pays for the planes with its own funds. As part of its management, the service is supposed to make sure proposed prices are fair and reasonable, Stefanek said.

Contractors are required under American law to provide such data for parts categorized as military items, but the Pentagon’s Inspector General has documented a range of such cases involving excess pricing of commercial parts sold to the military.

The Air Force originally requested pricing for 140 sample parts, which was later reduced to 29, including the Honeywell navigation light, Stefanek said. Boeing advised the Air Force that commercial pricing for 28 of the 29 sample parts was not available and that there was no non-government sales data upon which to determine a fair and reasonable price, she said.

‘Good Faith’In a statement, Boeing said it “made a good faith effort and worked with our supplier to provide the U.S. Air Force with pricing data for the navigation light” but the service “requested supplier proprietary cost and pricing data that was not available to Boeing.

Despite the misgivings about the price of the lights and overall contract, “after nearly 18 months of requests for information to support negotiations,” Air Force Major General Cameron Holt, deputy assistant secretary for contracting, “determined it was in the best interest of the government” to award the eventual $79.4 million contract in April. According to the summary, the decision was made “to meet Japan’s need for spare parts by the expected delivery date and operation” of its first KC-46.

Boeing has a different view.

“To further demonstrate good faith, Boeing offered to exclude the navigation light from the contract negotiations to allow the Air Force to negotiate directly with the supplier, but the Air Force decided to move forward with procuring the navigation light through Boeing,” spokeswoman Kathleen Kelly in a statement.

Funding for the the navigation light accounted for less than 1% of the total contract value, she said.

As for the Air Force claim of a 1,500% price increase, “Boeing mistakenly undercharged” the Air Force in earlier spare parts contracts, Kelly said.

“We charged the correct price for subsequent KC-46 Tanker spares contracts, resulting in the perception of a price increase,” she said. “In actuality, this was a price correction. Our error was isolated, and we owned our mistake.”

Honeywell spokesman Adam Kress said via email that the company declined to comment.

The Air Force has notified Japan of its “inability to determine fair and reasonable pricing, although the total proposed contract price is below the range authorized by Japan for the spares contract,” Air Force spokeswoman Stefanek said.

The service is also expediting a new contract vehicle “to compete future KC-46 spares to the maximum extent available in order to improve future contract pricing through competition,” Stefanek said.

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE



To: ggersh who wrote (172912)6/7/2021 9:25:15 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 219459
 
The deep-state spin is that China exporting progress after eons of non-China exploitation of the less-developed regions of the planet is bad bad bad

Africa and Latam must say "no"

good thing that the folks in the less-developed regions do not buy into the BS spun by the likes of the Atlantic Council ...

I am a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and the Founding Principal of International Market Analysis, a Washington, D.C.-based global risk advisory boutique. I advise

forbes.com

China’s Journey To The Center Of The Earth - For Rare Minerals
Ariel Cohen
09:25am EDT

|Jun 2, 2021,|4,271 views

Energy
I cover energy, security, Europe, Russia/Eurasia & the Middle East

Men work with trucks at the Mirador mine of Ecuadorian Ecuacorriente, subsidiary of China's ... [+]
AFP via Getty ImagesThe recent $3 billion sale of Chile’s Compañía General de Electricidad to China’s State Grid Corporation brought total Chinese control of electricity transmission in Chile up to 57%. Similar PRC acquisitions and projects are currently being advanced in Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina, Honduras, Peru, and Columbia, where corporations are building hydropower, wind, and solar power stations. But China's energy push into Latin America is not limited to infrastructure. This is fast becoming a multi-pronged approach that also includes the securing of critical minerals, particularly rare earth elements (REEs). The United States, meanwhile, is mum.

Beijing has invested over $180 million into Venezuelan nickel mining, and an additional $580 million into more general mining services. Similar deals are underway in Chile and Peru, which account for 55% of China’s copper. Chinese state-owned company Chinalco has a controlling interest in the Peruvian Toromocho and La Bambas copper mines, with another Chinese-backed mine in Ecuador. China’s Xinjiang TBEA has acquired a 49% stake in Bolivia’s lithium industry as well, and while lithium, like copper and nickel, is not a rare earth, it remains a key component of many electric vehicle batteries.

While China searches for REE plays in Latin America amidst its critical mineral push, it already claims a near-global monopoly on rare earth extraction and refining. REEs are the building blocks of 21st century technology and China has moved aggressively to take control of each stage of the supply chain, establishing infrastructure and co-opting regional markets and elites well in advance of other nations. The United States may be losing the race for the future before most of its citizens hear the starting pistol.

Right now, China is home to a staggering 30% of global REE mined ores within its borders, and makes up 80% of worldwide rare-earth processing production. Their investments into countries in mineral-rich Africa, Central Asia, and Latin America seek to heighten that number, allowing Beijing to become the global supplier of vital, strategic resources crucial to our technological progress and economic development. Rare earths are the oil of the 21st century.

Through various ventures launched since 2006, Chinese mining companies invested a total of $36 billion in Sub-Saharan Africa, and they keep building on. Abilities to do so derive from a history of anti-colonial political support and foreign direct investment throughout African nations. Beijing has significant investments in cobalt mining throughout the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where 60% of global cobalt reserves are found.

KOLWEZI, DRC: A miner collects small chunks of cobalt inside the CDM (Congo DongFang Mining) Kasulo ... [+]
Corbis via Getty ImagesWhile cobalt is not designated as a rare-earth, it is in the ‘critical mineral’ family with REEs and remains a primary ingredient of the ubiquitous lithium-ion battery. With its projects in the DRC, China now controls 72% of global cobalt refining capacity.

In South America and Southeast Asia, Chinese companies have captured large quantities of REE supplies and built significant mining infrastructure. Over half of unrefined heavy REEs imported to China come from Myanmar, while partnerships with Brazilian mining companies have yielded positive trade relations in Latin America. Greenland, another mineral rich region, saw Chinese corporation Shenghe Resources Holding Co. attempt to build an REE extraction facility at Kvanefjeld that would’ve produced 10% of the world’s rare earths, though. However, the venture was blocked by the environmentalist political party, Inuit Ataquit.

Like Russia with its natural gas supplies to Europe and Ukraine, the Chinese government has already demonstrated its willingness to use REEs supplies as an economic weapon. After the Japanese Coast Guard detained a Chinese fisherman near the Senkaku Islands in 2010, Beijing briefly shut down REE exports to Japan in protest. Using this leverage, China was able to eventually secure the release of its fisherman. This will not be the last time China presses its REE advantage to coerce its neighbors.

That geopolitical leverage could be used against the U.S. and its allies, if the west fails to acquire its own REE supply and refining infrastructure.

Recent efforts to bolster U.S. rare earth supplies began with Presidential Executive Orders 13817 in late 2017 and 13953 in late 2020, which authorized the Department of Defense to evaluate domestic mineral site expansion and declared over-reliance on Chinese REE processing to be a national emergency. The designations applied by the Trump administration continued into the Biden administration, where Executive Order 14017 ordered a major review into supply chains gaps.

The Mountain Pass Rare Earth Mine in California is the only integrated rare-earth extraction and processing facility in North America. However, that number is expected to rise given increasing federal and corporate interest. Australia’s Lynas Corp, the second largest global REE producer, was awarded $30.4 million by the U.S. Department of Defense to build a processing facility in Rio Hondo, Texas. Materials mined by Lynas, originally shipped to China, will instead be bound for the United States, where domestic companies will be responsible for refinement.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2009. MOUNTAIN PASS, CA. In the lab at Molycorp Minerals mine in Mountain Pass, CA, ... [+]
Los Angeles Times via Getty ImagesCooperation between the “five eyes” of the U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the U.K. is crucial, as well as additional joint ventures with Mexico, South American countries, and other key NATO and non-NATO allies. Yet, as the Biden Administration plans to diminish the U.S. and its allies’ dependence on Chinese REE capabilities, it needs to keep in mind the length of the supply chain and its defensibility, as well as the cost of transportation.

Rare-earth mineral extraction will likely create a competition between Washington and Beijing in the developing world, from Latin America and Africa across the Eurasian landmass. In this modern gold rush, for now, Beijing holds a strong early advantage. To catch up, American policy makers must treat the security of rare earth supply chains in the same way that we once treated our crude oil and natural gas imports in the pre-shale era: a matter of vital national security.

With Assistance From Liam Taylor

I am a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and the Founding Principal of International Market Analysis, a Washington, D.C.-based global risk advisory boutique. I advise I am a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and the Founding Principal of International Market Analysis, a Washington, D.C.-based global risk advisory boutique. I advise law firms and corporations, and once helped to get a famous Russian oligarch out of Putin’s jail. I am also a Senior Fellow with the International Tax and Investment Center (ITIC) where I direct their Energy, Growth, and Security Program (EGS). For 22 years, I was the Heritage Foundation’s leading Russia/Eurasia and international energy expert. My consultancy focuses on political risk, national security, and energy policy, especially in Russia/Europe/Eurasia, and the Middle East. The firm’s interventions span international security, economics, law, politics, terrorism, and crime and corruption. In addition to consulting for both the public and private sectors, I testify regularly before the U.S. Congress, and appear on Bloomberg, CNN, FOX, BBC, Al Jazeera, and other TV channels. In my free time, I enjoy skiing, sailing, classical music, and my two cats.