Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1303735)	6/12/2021 11:38:14 PM
From: Winfastorlose	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573902

The Clinton Body Count ratchets up another notch. Can you spell Arkancide? TV anchor who busted Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac commits suicide…

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1303735)	6/12/2021 11:43:29 PM
From: Winfastorlose	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1573902

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1303735)	6/12/2021 11:55:23 PM
From: Winfastorlose	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573902

California. California broke into the “probable election fraud column.” Who knows how many replications of the following took place during the mail-in ballot harvesting deluge in California last year? In a bombshell report from the Santa Barbara News-Press:Approximately 3,000 mail-in ballots counted in the Nov. 3 election were supposedly cast by UCSB students residing in a voting precinct that, along with other dorm buildings, includes the Francisco Torres/Santa Catalina Residence Hall at 6850 El Colegio Road in Goleta. Problem: Due to COVID-19, the Torres Building, which normally accommodates 1,300 students, was empty and locked down through most of 2020, as were all other UCSB dorms. This means no students/voters were residing inside the Torres Building (nor any of the other dorms) during the election season. It also means these ballots were fraudulent. That’s because there’s a second problem: These ballots could not legally have been forwarded to students where they were actually living. Why not? Because forwarding ballots to alternative addresses is a felony. redstate.com

To: Heywood40 who wrote (1303735)	6/12/2021 11:57:52 PM
From: Winfastorlose	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1573902

Michigan. Lawyer Matthew DePerno is appealing a case dismissed recently by a Michigan judge in Antrim County. Deperno subsequently made this claim:“And I’ll tell you something we discovered this weekend. We can now show that after the election is done, someone, anyone really who has access to those tabulators, can reopen the election, run more ballots through the tabulator, print off new tabulator tape with a new balance and backdate that tape to November 3rd.” Comments made by DePerno on Twitter about a remote login to the election management system on 5 Nov are even more astounding: We have been lied to. The Antrim County election management system (EMS) was REMOTELY and successfully logged into anonymously on 11/05/2020 at 5:55 PM and again on 11/17/2020 at 5:16 PM. Yes, that is correct … REMOTELY. Those dates are significant because they correspond directly to the dates the county and SOS were trying to correct the intentional computer problems that subverted the election. These logons appear to have escalated privileges at the time of logon. Again .. REMOTELY.” But we were told there was no internet connection. In an accredited system, an anonymous user should not be authorized by the accreditation authority, but would instead be required to enter a specific user name and password to utilize the system. 4. We were told there was no internet connection. We were told there was no remote access. We were told this was human error. All lies. This is fraud. This decertifies the Antrim County election. SOS Benson should resign or be impeached. It gets worse . . . in Central Lake Township (Antrim County) we discovered 82% reversal rate of ballots. Why? Because someone intentionally tampered with Left Marker #18 on the ballots prior to the election. Let that sink in. Lawyer up! This is really really really bad. — Matthew S. DePerno, Esq. (@mdeperno) June 9, 2021