SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (17036)2/4/1998 9:25:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Some Things You Just Can't Package zdnet.com

Esteemed ilk sister Mary Jo Foley weighs in on "Kinder, Gentler II: Bill Sings!". Somehow, she shares my skepticism.

On 20/20 in an interview with (the equally unpackagable) Barbara Walters last Friday, Gates tried to put aside the bad attitude which has made him famous and be just one of the guys. Through gritted teeth, Gates talked kids and marriage and even religion. His short-lived rendition of "Twinkle, twinkle" is likely to replace his ill-fated Connie Chung chair jumping spectacle as the CEO's most embarrassing made-for-TV moment.

Oh dear. I actually thought it was cute, after a fashion. At least he didn't do a trio with Barney and Bob. The Three Microsoft Amigos Ride Again!

But there's one big fault in Microsoft's PR logic. Gates is not everyman. He may drive his own car and claim (not all that convincingly) that "my priority in my life is my family," but Gates and his cast of multimillionaires in the making are not just a bunch of boys and girls that wanna have fun.

Those are powerful claims, but they don't jibe exactly with what third-party software vendors and Microsoft's own hardware partners are telling reporters "off the record." (See our first issue cover story on "Microsoft's Secret Power Broker" for all the gory details. ) (http://www.zdnet.com/sr/breaking/980202/980202a.html if you missed it) Hardware vendors are telling tales of Microsoft forcing their hand via software licensing contracts that call for steep price increases and bundling and marketing requirements that stifle innovation and competition.

Steep price increases? But Larry Sullivan has assured us that can't be true! Who are we to believe? Hardware, half the price it was a year ago, and those guys actually have manufacturing costs. Software, going up, except for "free" IE, like "free" beer or cigarettes. Or Reggie's chosen analogy, "free" drugs like you get from your friendly neighborhood pusher. I feel my IE hangover coming on again.

Cheers, Dan.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (17036)2/4/1998 9:38:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Netscape Tries a Nonprofit Approach to Profits nytimes.com

The Times weighs in on free software, in the nonalcoholic sense. Long article, both sides presented, stirring conclusion.

The most optimistic view, however, may be found at the top of the Web page run by The Openscape Group hoping to help usher a free version of Netscape into the future. It quotes Fritjof Capra's "The Web Of Life" as saying: "All larger organisms, including ourselves, are living testimonies to the fact that destructive practices do not work in the long run. In the end, the aggressors always destroy themselves, making way for others who know how to cooperate and get along. Life is much less a competitive struggle for survival than a triumph of cooperation and creativity."

Cheers, Dan.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (17036)2/4/1998 9:52:00 AM
From: K. M. Strickler  Respond to of 24154
 
Thanks for the info Dan! You are correct about xDSL both in the availability and the short CO distances. A lot of Hi-Speed stuff will be available in the cities 'for those who can afford' or to the large accounts that are willing to 'pay' for a 'remote office' either very close or 'on site'. All of the hi-speed stuff is still quite 'spendy' so those who choose to live 'out aways' are still going to be 'stuck'! I actually will stay in the rural area because of the 'speed of life' is so much more relaxed!

On the cable adaptation, the same problem arises. The cable companies in the 'country' really aren't! Unless the density is something in excess of 10 per mile, it isn't cost effective to install cable. If there is a grouping of 100, and that group is too far out, they won't be able to get service. If you add the extra cost for data access, and you only get 10% of your television business, you can see that the cost for implementation will rapidly outstrip the revenue returned. BG's investigation of the 2200 low orbital, refridgerator sized satellites will change that whole relationship.

As for choice of monopolies, 'tis true, some we like 'sort of' some we don't 'sort of'!

Thoughts?

Ken